2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jece.2021.105793
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rice husk-based adsorbents for removing ammonia: Kinetics, thermodynamics and adsorption mechanism

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
0
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…At 0.1 surface coverage, the dispersive surface energy (g D s ) for the three ber types followed the order of wool (49.1 mJ m −2 ) > cotton (40.8 mJ m −2 ) > nylon (37.1 mJ m −2 ), indicating that wool ber showed the highest odor adsorption potential via physical interaction, which was followed by cotton and nylon, whereas the specic surface energy (g sp s ) for the three ber types followed the order of nylon (9.6 mJ m −2 ) > wool (7.9 mJ m −2 ) > cotton (5.9 mJ m −2 ), suggesting that nylon ber demonstrated the best adsorption potential via chemical interaction. 41 The dispersive surface energy was higher than the specic surface energy for all three ber types, revealing that the potential for physisorption was higher than that of the chemisorption for all three bers. Total surface energy (g T s ) is the combination of dispersive and specic surface energies, which represents the number of active sites per unit surface.…”
Section: Insight Into the Adsorption Mechanismmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…At 0.1 surface coverage, the dispersive surface energy (g D s ) for the three ber types followed the order of wool (49.1 mJ m −2 ) > cotton (40.8 mJ m −2 ) > nylon (37.1 mJ m −2 ), indicating that wool ber showed the highest odor adsorption potential via physical interaction, which was followed by cotton and nylon, whereas the specic surface energy (g sp s ) for the three ber types followed the order of nylon (9.6 mJ m −2 ) > wool (7.9 mJ m −2 ) > cotton (5.9 mJ m −2 ), suggesting that nylon ber demonstrated the best adsorption potential via chemical interaction. 41 The dispersive surface energy was higher than the specic surface energy for all three ber types, revealing that the potential for physisorption was higher than that of the chemisorption for all three bers. Total surface energy (g T s ) is the combination of dispersive and specic surface energies, which represents the number of active sites per unit surface.…”
Section: Insight Into the Adsorption Mechanismmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…The adsorption of gas molecules by porous materials can be affected by the gas−pore-surface interaction energy, pore diameter, pore volume, pore specific surface area, pore morphology, and surface roughness. 34 In terms of the specific surface area, it was expected that the adsorption capacity of TEPS-WSNs (surface area of 630 m 2 g −1 ) for benzene was higher than those of OTES-WSNs and HDTMS-WSNs (surface areas of 517 and 599 m 2 g −1 , respectively). However, the experimental results differed from the expectation, suggesting that factors other than the specific surface area of the adsorbent contributed to the adsorption performance to a greater extent.…”
Section: ■ Experimental Sectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To increase the adsorption, Love and Park's research group studied ozone-treated activated carbon for increasing acid functional groups, such as carbonyl and ether groups [35,36]. Previous research determined that the adsorption process of ammonia onto activated carbon follows the pseudo-second order model [39]. The pseudo-second order kinetic model suggests that chemical adsorption is the dominant mechanism.…”
Section: Ammonia Adsorption Testmentioning
confidence: 99%