2016
DOI: 10.1007/s10043-016-0220-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rician noise reduction in magnetic resonance images using adaptive non-local mean and guided image filtering

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Their worse performance compared with the GS function may be attributed to a lack of strong correlations between similar patches in the brain MRI scans. 3) The MRI data collected in the spatial frequency space are usually corrupted by Gaussian noise ( Mahmood et al, 2016 ), and GS can help reduce the effect of Gaussian noise by exploiting the spatial correlations. Therefore, the nonlocal method with weight setting by the GS function always obtained the best results.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their worse performance compared with the GS function may be attributed to a lack of strong correlations between similar patches in the brain MRI scans. 3) The MRI data collected in the spatial frequency space are usually corrupted by Gaussian noise ( Mahmood et al, 2016 ), and GS can help reduce the effect of Gaussian noise by exploiting the spatial correlations. Therefore, the nonlocal method with weight setting by the GS function always obtained the best results.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to Fourier-domain and PCA based processing, it has been shown that DWI and DTI data can be denoised with other signal processing algorithms, ranging from wavelet-based smoothing [ 54 ], to the anisotropic diffusion filtering technique [ 55 , 56 ], to adaptive smoothing [ 57 59 ], to non-local means variants [ 60 ], to patch-based analysis [ 61 ], to rank constraints [ 62 ], to singular value decomposition [ 63 ], to sparseness and self-similarity based denoising [ 64 ]. These advanced methods were not evaluated in our current study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The denoising method becomes adaptive, i.e., the adaptive NLM (ANLM), when an NLM method adapts its h parameter values based on the characteristics of the image. 22,26,29,36,37 Previous studies have suggested that the optimal values for h could be selected to be proportional to the noise variation. 22,25 For an image with an unknown true noise variation, the noise level, σðx i Þ, at voxel x i , could be estimated by computing the minimal Euclidean distance of the weighted average of all blocks neighboring the voxel x i E Q -T A R G E T ; t e m p : i n t r a l i n k -; e 0 0 4 ; 3 2 6 ; 6 0 9…”
Section: Basics Of Nonlocal Means-based Denoisingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15,21,22,27,28 To reduce image noise while preserving structural information, both the image noise and the anatomical information in the acquired image should be considered together. [29][30][31] Prior algorithms adjusted the denoising filter strength according to the measured local structural information, the percentage of the maximum intensity level, the dominance of wavelets, and principle components, or visual assessments. 20,21,26,31 In the wavelet-NLM filter algorithm, 15 the denoising parameter is adapted over the different spatial frequency resolutions of the image.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%