2021
DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofab018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rifampicin Mono-Resistant Tuberculosis—A Review of an Uncommon But Growing Challenge for Global Tuberculosis Control

Abstract: Tuberculosis (TB) remains the leading cause of death by an infectious pathogen worldwide, and drug-resistant TB is a critical and rising obstacle to global control efforts. Most scientific studies and global TB efforts have focused on multidrug-resistant TB (MDR-TB), meaning isolates resistant to both isoniazid (INH) and rifampicin (RIF). Newer diagnostic tests are resulting in an increasing awareness of RIF-resistant TB in addition to MDR disease. To date, RIF resistance has been assumed to be synonymous with… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
1
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The low proportions of INH mono-resistance at 9.8% (4.8–17.3) in this study may be attributed to a selection bias as a result of our selected study population. However, the higher proportions of RIF mono-resistance at 90.2% (82.7–95.2) are in agreement with two studies that raise awareness of increasing levels of this type of drug resistance among TB patients [ 24 , 25 ]. Malenfant and Brewer [ 24 ] recently reported that the availability of diagnostic assays that allow for quick detection of RIF resistance has increased awareness of patients with rifampicin mono-resistant TB (RR-TB), which was previously thought to be uncommon [ 24 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The low proportions of INH mono-resistance at 9.8% (4.8–17.3) in this study may be attributed to a selection bias as a result of our selected study population. However, the higher proportions of RIF mono-resistance at 90.2% (82.7–95.2) are in agreement with two studies that raise awareness of increasing levels of this type of drug resistance among TB patients [ 24 , 25 ]. Malenfant and Brewer [ 24 ] recently reported that the availability of diagnostic assays that allow for quick detection of RIF resistance has increased awareness of patients with rifampicin mono-resistant TB (RR-TB), which was previously thought to be uncommon [ 24 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Mono-resistance to RIF was higher than INH monoresistance and is backed by recent studies that have raised more awareness on this phenomenon [ 24 , 25 ]. The low proportions of INH mono-resistance at 9.8% (4.8–17.3) in this study may be attributed to a selection bias as a result of our selected study population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These longer regimens likely expose patients with mono-resistance to unnecessarily long and toxic drug regimens, and also exclude the benefits of INH therapy [61]. BEAT TB is at the enrolment stage assessing the efficacy of 6 months of BDQ, LZD, delamanid (DLM), LFX and CFZ in comparison to current practices in South Africa [62].…”
Section: Phase I Phase Ii Phase Iii Approvalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, approximately a half-million new cases of rifampicin-resistant TB (RR-TB) were detected in 2018; according to the WHO, MDR-TB requires longer treatments, which are less effective and much more expensive than non-resistant TB [ 143 ].…”
Section: Global Problem Of Antibiotic Resistancementioning
confidence: 99%