2019
DOI: 10.1126/sciimmunol.aau8943
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

RIG-I activation is critical for responsiveness to checkpoint blockade

Abstract: Achieving durable clinical responses to immune checkpoint inhibitors remains a challenge. Here, we demonstrate that immunotherapy with anti–CTLA-4 and its combination with anti–PD-1 rely on tumor cell–intrinsic activation of the cytosolic RNA receptor RIG-I. Mechanistically, tumor cell–intrinsic RIG-I signaling induced caspase-3–mediated tumor cell death, cross-presentation of tumor-associated antigen by CD103+ dendritic cells, subsequent expansion of tumor antigen–specific CD8+ T cells, and their accumulation… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

10
86
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(100 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
10
86
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…FOXC2 expression was also associated with downregulation of various IFN-stimulated genes, including Oas1a, Oas1g, Isg15, Ifi27, Ifi35, Ifitm3, Ifit1, and Ifit3, among others. In keeping with our observation of FOXC2-associated downregulation of Ddx58 expression and the aforementioned link between FOXC2 expression and poor PFS of melanoma patients on ipilimumab, it is worth noting that Heidegger et al recently demonstrated the importance of tumor cell-intrinsic activation of RIG-I in the success of checkpoint blockade therapy (38). Interestingly, RIG-I deficiency in cancer cells was also recently linked to the induction of tolerogenic dendritic cells (39), a cell type that could impact the efficacy of several immune-based therapies and one that is of particular interest to our laboratory (40,41).…”
Section: Overview and Reuse Of Datasupporting
confidence: 88%
“…FOXC2 expression was also associated with downregulation of various IFN-stimulated genes, including Oas1a, Oas1g, Isg15, Ifi27, Ifi35, Ifitm3, Ifit1, and Ifit3, among others. In keeping with our observation of FOXC2-associated downregulation of Ddx58 expression and the aforementioned link between FOXC2 expression and poor PFS of melanoma patients on ipilimumab, it is worth noting that Heidegger et al recently demonstrated the importance of tumor cell-intrinsic activation of RIG-I in the success of checkpoint blockade therapy (38). Interestingly, RIG-I deficiency in cancer cells was also recently linked to the induction of tolerogenic dendritic cells (39), a cell type that could impact the efficacy of several immune-based therapies and one that is of particular interest to our laboratory (40,41).…”
Section: Overview and Reuse Of Datasupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Recent work established the validity of activating PRRs as a strategy to enhance a therapeutic immune response against tumors. Agonists of STING and RIG-I have shown promise in mouse models as standalone or adjuvants for enhancing immunotherapies (Elion et al 2018;Ramanjulu et al 2018;Heidegger et al 2019;Jiang et al 2019). Conversely, in some contexts, interferon signaling is beneficial to tumor growth (Khodarev et al 2012;Boelens et al 2014;Nabet et al 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, given adequate stratification based on predictive biomarkers, checkpoint inhibition may still be a valuable option in OC, particularly as an adjuvant treatment after primary surgical cytoreduction. It remains to be seen whether RIG-I expression can refine such stratification and inform PD-L1 targeted therapy in a residual disease setting: while responsiveness to checkpoint inhibition depends at least in part on RIG-I activation, 57 RIG-I associated interferon expression may in turn counteract the efficacy of this immunotherapeutic modality. 58 In this regard, it is important to note that ISGs expressed by cancer and immune cells are differentially associated with responsiveness to checkpoint inhibition despite their expression being positively correlated (explainable by a threshold phenomenon).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%