2007
DOI: 10.1088/0264-9381/24/9/013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rigidity of compact manifolds and positivity of quasi-local mass

Abstract: In this paper, we obtain some rigidity theorems on compact manifolds with nonempty boundary. The results may be related to the positivity of some quasi-local mass of Brown–York type. The main argument is to use monotonicity of quantities similar to the Brown–York quasi-local mass in a foliation of quasi-spherical metrics. Together with a hyperbolic version of positivity of a mass quantity, we obtain our main results.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

3
55
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
3
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Let Σ be any given compact strictly convex hypersurface in R 3 . If (Ω, g) is a compact Riemannian 3-manifold with nonnegative scalar curvature whose boundary is isometric to Σ and has positive mean curvature H, then it was proved in [19] [20] that (43) does hold if Σ is a geodesic sphere in H 3 and (Ω, g) has scalar curvature no less than −6, which is consistent with Proposition 3.1. It remains an interesting question to know whether (43) is true for a compact 3-manifold (Ω, g) whose boundary is isometric to a geodesic sphere in Σ 3 + and whose scalar curvature is greater than or equal to +6.…”
supporting
confidence: 60%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Let Σ be any given compact strictly convex hypersurface in R 3 . If (Ω, g) is a compact Riemannian 3-manifold with nonnegative scalar curvature whose boundary is isometric to Σ and has positive mean curvature H, then it was proved in [19] [20] that (43) does hold if Σ is a geodesic sphere in H 3 and (Ω, g) has scalar curvature no less than −6, which is consistent with Proposition 3.1. It remains an interesting question to know whether (43) is true for a compact 3-manifold (Ω, g) whose boundary is isometric to a geodesic sphere in Σ 3 + and whose scalar curvature is greater than or equal to +6.…”
supporting
confidence: 60%
“…As a direct application of Theorem 3.1 and Corollary 2.2, we have Before we proceed to discuss properties of general critical metrics of V (·), we want to relate the result in Proposition 3.1 to the results in [19] and [20]. Let Σ be any given compact strictly convex hypersurface in R 3 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This result is generalized in [459] by weakening the energy condition, in which case lower estimates of the Brown-York energy can still be given. For some rigidity theorems connected with this positivity result, see [461]; and for their generalization for higher dimensional spin manifolds, see [329]. …”
Section: The Hamilton-jacobi Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The time component of the embedding can be chosen to be cosh r, which is the same as the static potential here. In fact, the same weighting factor was considered in [23], where another quasi-local mass with the hyperbolic space as reference was studied. We remark that the total mass for asymptotically hyperbolic manifolds has been considered by many authors; see, e.g., [1,6,7,20,26,27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%