1995
DOI: 10.1016/1075-2935(95)90006-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rigorous grading does not raise standards: It only lowers grades

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2000
2000

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 26 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If grades have an inherent ambiguity, an inherent mystery, then what exactly is certified by a grade or by grades in the aggregate? According to Agnew (1995), decontextualized grades are meaningless: "The fact that low grades, high grades, any grades in isolation reveal nothing about institutional standards, quality of teaching, or student skills seems to have been overlooked by administrators, politicians, department heads, and (even) professors eager to latch onto some quantifiable 'proof' that students are being held to the 'rigorous grading standards' that Cole [another writer] recommends. In isolation, grades are meaningless" (p. 94).…”
Section: The Relationship Between Assessment and Academic Standardsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If grades have an inherent ambiguity, an inherent mystery, then what exactly is certified by a grade or by grades in the aggregate? According to Agnew (1995), decontextualized grades are meaningless: "The fact that low grades, high grades, any grades in isolation reveal nothing about institutional standards, quality of teaching, or student skills seems to have been overlooked by administrators, politicians, department heads, and (even) professors eager to latch onto some quantifiable 'proof' that students are being held to the 'rigorous grading standards' that Cole [another writer] recommends. In isolation, grades are meaningless" (p. 94).…”
Section: The Relationship Between Assessment and Academic Standardsmentioning
confidence: 99%