2014
DOI: 10.1186/1756-0500-7-183
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ring cell migration assay identifies distinct effects of extracellular matrix proteins on cancer cell migration

Abstract: BackgroundAlterations in cell migration are a hallmark of cancer cell invasion and metastasis. In vitro assays commonly used to study cell migration, including the scratch wound healing assay, Boyden chamber assay, and newly developed advanced systems with microfluidics, each have several disadvantages.FindingsHere we describe an easy and cost-effective in vitro assay for cell migration employing cloning rings to create gaps in the cell monolayer (“ring cell migration assay”). The assay was used to quantitate … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This indicates a generic pro-migratory function of a protein interface adjacent to viscous polysaccharide. In previous work, glioma cell migration was primarily assessed in single-cell migration assays, using cell suspensions after enzymatic dispersion (Nakada et al 2013 ; Chen and Nalbantoglu 2014 ). However, when tested as tumor-like multicellular spheroids, which allow cells to establish cell–cell junctions, both U-251 and E-98 cells migrated collectively, as a cohesive sheet of cells, along the rBM-hyaluronan interface (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This indicates a generic pro-migratory function of a protein interface adjacent to viscous polysaccharide. In previous work, glioma cell migration was primarily assessed in single-cell migration assays, using cell suspensions after enzymatic dispersion (Nakada et al 2013 ; Chen and Nalbantoglu 2014 ). However, when tested as tumor-like multicellular spheroids, which allow cells to establish cell–cell junctions, both U-251 and E-98 cells migrated collectively, as a cohesive sheet of cells, along the rBM-hyaluronan interface (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, different assays were developed to model glioma microenvironments of the brain tissue and test the extent and mechanisms of glioma cell invasion (Rao et al 2014 ; Rape et al 2014 ). Widely used 2D assays are based on coating of the culture dish with ECM molecules, including laminin, fibronectin or collagen (Nakada et al 2013 ; Chen and Nalbantoglu 2014 ). However, these models lack crucial parameters of 3D brain environments which modulate migration mechanisms, including (1) low substrate stiffness, (2) anatomically complex 3D organization, (3) 3D space confinements which enable adhesion-dependent and adhesion-independent migration, and (4) molecularly rich ECM composition maintained by brain cells and containing chemotactic factors (Rape et al 2014 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Metastasis is the leading cause of death for patients diagnosed with cancer. Tumor invasiveness is known to be enhanced by epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), which confers metastatic properties upon cancer cells by increasing their migration [1,2]. Therefore, targeting tumor cell motility is an extremely important and meaningful challenge in the prevention of metastasis and improving the effectiveness of cancer treatment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, while standard treatment strategies mainly focus on the bulk tumor mass, the deeper understanding of tumor cell invasion and the development of novel drugs for its inhibition is of major importance. Classical 2D cell culture or co-culture systems for tumor cell migration, like scratch assays, transwell/Boyden chamber assays or the coating of wells with extracellular matrix (ECM) components like collagen, fibronectin, or laminin [ 4 , 5 ] are rather simple and inexpensive. Yet, such standard methods do not allow for sufficiently assessing the invasive potential due to the absence of matrix components and barrier structures to be encountered by the invading cells.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%