1990
DOI: 10.1016/0031-9201(90)90205-c
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ring-core fluxgate magnetometers for use as observatory variometers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Narod and Bennest, 1990) to sense the fluxgate signal at twice the sensor drive frequency (2 f ) are not required in this design. In the prototype, the sensor is directly digitised by sampling the instantaneous output from the sensor.…”
Section: Direct Digitisationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Narod and Bennest, 1990) to sense the fluxgate signal at twice the sensor drive frequency (2 f ) are not required in this design. In the prototype, the sensor is directly digitised by sampling the instantaneous output from the sensor.…”
Section: Direct Digitisationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Narod and Bennest, 1990); however, it has been missing in previous digital designs. The technique requires a low-pass reconstruction filter on the digital feedback to avoid clipping the transconductance feedback amplifier with the comparatively large switching signal from the PWM.…”
Section: A Voltage-to-current Converter To Drive the Feedback Coilmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(Narod and Bennest, 1990), with three ring-core sensors mounted orthogonally on a common base (Fig. 4).…”
Section: Electronic Temperature Compensationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The specific materials used in sensor construction are often not provided in instrument publications. However, MACOR is explicitly mentioned or known to be used in the NASA MAGSAT satellite (Acuña et al, 1978); the S100, STE, and PC104 observatory magnetometers developed by Narod Geophysics Ltd. (Narod and Bennest, 1990); both the Canadian CARISMA ground network (Mann et al, 2008) and the US EMScope magnetotelluric network (Schultz, 2009); the Danish Oersted satellite (Nielsen et al, 1995); the miniaturised SMILE instrument (Forslund et al, 2007); the Vector Fluxgate Magnetometer (VMAG) for the Demonstration and Science Experiment program (Moldwin, 2010); a prototype radiation tolerant fluxgate (Miles et al, 2013); and the Canadian Space Agency Cassiope/e-POP satellite (Wallis et al, 2015). Unfortunately, MACOR is expensive, difficult to machine, and brittle.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%