2003
DOI: 10.1088/0029-5515/44/1/020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ripple losses during ICRF heating in Tore Supra

Abstract: The toroidal field coils in Tore Supra are supra-conducting, and their number is restricted to 18. As a result, the ripple is fairly large, about 7% at the plasma boundary. Tore Supra has consequently been equipped with dedicated ripple loss diagnostics, which has allowed ripple loss studies. This paper reports on the measurements made with these diagnostics and provides an analysis of the experimental results, comparing them with theoretical expectations whenever possible. Furthermore, the main heating source… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
47
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The major points that were understood on ripple losses at the time of the publication of the ITER Physics Basis were: (1) ripple losses are numerically predictable as indicated by experiments in JET [53], JT-60U [54] and TFTR [10]; (2) ripple losses of α-particles in ITER are anticipated to be negligible in discharges with monotonic, positive magnetic shear [3]; (3) on the other hand, the losses can be a concern in advanced operation scenarios based on reversed shear. Since the writing of the ITER Physics Basis, publications on ripple loss experiments have appeared for TFTR [6,10,55,56], JFT-2M [57][58][59] and Tore Supra [60,61].…”
Section: Ripple-induced Lossesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The major points that were understood on ripple losses at the time of the publication of the ITER Physics Basis were: (1) ripple losses are numerically predictable as indicated by experiments in JET [53], JT-60U [54] and TFTR [10]; (2) ripple losses of α-particles in ITER are anticipated to be negligible in discharges with monotonic, positive magnetic shear [3]; (3) on the other hand, the losses can be a concern in advanced operation scenarios based on reversed shear. Since the writing of the ITER Physics Basis, publications on ripple loss experiments have appeared for TFTR [6,10,55,56], JFT-2M [57][58][59] and Tore Supra [60,61].…”
Section: Ripple-induced Lossesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…$0.011 * E ICRH . The most likely mechanism is the stochastic diffusion of fast ions orbits due to the strong magnetic ripple [4,5], resulting in loss of non-thermal ions ($500 keV) on the low field side, below or at the mid-plane, as also observed in JT-60 [6]. Most of the long discharges with LHCD + ICRH carried out in Tore Supra in 2004-2005 were at low plasma current (I P = 0.6 MA) and at low electron density (n e $ 2.5 · 10 19 m À3 ), in order to have a large fraction of non-inductive current with LHCD.…”
Section: Calorimetric Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The nominal operating frequency is adjusted in order for the wave energy to be deposited in the central region to prevent W accumulation [36,37]. However, due to the finite magnetic ripple level expected in WEST, the fast ions produced by ICRH can be deconfined [38]. As an illustration, figure 9 shows the good confinement region size which is affected by the value of the plasma current.…”
Section: Ion Cyclotron Resonance Heatingmentioning
confidence: 99%