RIRS (Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery) is safe and effective in aging male patients: A single surgeon experience

Erkoç, Mustafa; Agalarov, Samir

doi:10.5455/annalsmedres.2019.09.546

Cited by 4 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…While Ekici et al have demonstrated that RIRS was an effective and reliable method in the pediatric age group, Erkoc et al have reported that RIRS was an effective and reliable method in elderly patients. 5,6 Besiroglu et al and Nakamon et al have presented that PCNL was a reliable method in all age groups. 7,8…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 97%

“…With the onset of widespread use of both methods, many studies have been conducted on their use in various age groups. 5–7 It has been demonstrated that both RIRS and PCNL could be applied safely in both children and advanced age groups. 5–8 The comparison of these methods has recently become very popular.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…5–7 It has been demonstrated that both RIRS and PCNL could be applied safely in both children and advanced age groups. 5–8 The comparison of these methods has recently become very popular. 9 Many studies on the comparison of M-PCNL and RIRS, especially in children, have been conducted.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Comparison of mini-PCNL and retrograde intrarenal surgery in the treatment of kidney stone over 50 years old patients

et al. 2021

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Mini-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (M-PCNL) and Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery (RIRS) are commonly used methods in treatment of kidney stones. The aim of our study is to compare the efficacy and safety of M-PCNL and RIRS in kidney stone treatment over 50 years old patients. A total of 125 patients, 65 of whom had RIRS, and 60 of whom had M-PCNL, were included in the study. Age, gender, BMI (Body-Mass Index), ASA (American Society of Anesthesiology) scores of the patients; stone size, stone location, operation side, ESWL history, HU (Hounsfield Unit) values, hospital stay durations, SFR, complication rates according to Clavien modification system, postoperative hemoglobin loss, postoperative transfusion rates, and patients who needed a secondary operation were recorded. SFR values were calculated in the postoperative third and sixth months. The data between the two groups had similar characteristics in terms of age, gender, BMI, HU, stone size, operation side, stone location, ESWL history, operation time, postoperative transfusion rate, postoperative Clavien complications ( p > 0.05). When the ASA categories were evaluated, the mean ASA scores, ASA I, and ASA II data had similar characteristics in both groups ( p > 0.05). When the ASA 3 scores were evaluated, the number of ASA III patients in the RIRS group was statistically significantly higher ( p < 0.05). When hospital stay duration and postoperative hemoglobin loss were examined, RIRS group was found to be advantageous ( p < 0.05). Postoperative third month SFR and Postoperative sixth month values were statistically significantly higher in M-PCNL group ( p < 0.05). M-PCNL and RIRS are methods that can be used safely and effectively over 50 years old patients in kidney stone surgery. M-PCNL has been found to be more advantageous in terms of SFR rates and as it requires less secondary intervention. RIRS is advantageous in terms of short hospital stay, postoperative hemoglobin loss, and applicability to patients who are not suitable for the prone position.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 97%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Comparison of mini-PCNL and retrograde intrarenal surgery in the treatment of kidney stone over 50 years old patients

et al. 2021

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Surgical data is outlined in Table II. A study showed that RIRS is reliable and effective procedure for pediatrics, while another study reported its effectiveness in elderly patients (Ekici et al, 2018;Erkoc and Agalarov, 2019).A Study conducted Ozcanli et al by demonstrated that PCNL is safe for all groups (Ozcanli and Erkoc, 2021). Recently both methods are being increasingly compared.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In M-PCNL 14-22Fr Amplatz Sheath is used (Jain et al, 2021). Both PCNL and RIRS are safely used in children and adults (Besiroglu et al, 2020;Ekici et al, 2018;Erkoc and Agalarov, 2019). Recently there has been increasing comparison between the effectiveness of both methods .…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Rirs and Mini-PCNL in Management of Kidney Stone: A Comparative Study

Akhtar

KHAN

USMAN

et al. 2022

Biol Clin Sci Res J

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

To compare results of retrograde intrarenal surgery and minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy in older patients, a retrospective study was conducted at the Department of Nephrology & Urology of MMDC&Ibn-e-Sina Hospital Multan from January 2021 to January 2022. The study included 135 patients, 65 underwent M-PCNL while 70 underwent RIRS. Gender, age, BMI, ASA scores, stone location and size, ESWL history, SFR and relevant parameters were recorded. Characteristics like gender, age, BMI, stone size and location, HU and ESWL history did not vary significantly in both group (p>0.05). Mean ASA scores and the data of ASA I and ASA II in both groups was also similar (p>0.05). Postoperative Clavien complications, operation time and postoperative transfusion rate in both groups did not vary significantly (p>0.05). M-PCNL patients had greater post operative SFR values (p<0.05). Retrograde intrarenal surgery and minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy arerecommended methodsin treatment of kidney stones.

show abstract

Efficacy of Aspiration-Assisted Ureteral Access Sheath (ClearPETRA) in Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery

Erkoc,

Bozkurt,

Sezgin

et al. 2024

Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

RIRS (Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery) is safe and effective in aging male patients: A single surgeon experience

Cited by 4 publications

References 0 publications

Comparison of mini-PCNL and retrograde intrarenal surgery in the treatment of kidney stone over 50 years old patients

Comparison of mini-PCNL and retrograde intrarenal surgery in the treatment of kidney stone over 50 years old patients

Rirs and Mini-PCNL in Management of Kidney Stone: A Comparative Study

Efficacy of Aspiration-Assisted Ureteral Access Sheath (ClearPETRA) in Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About