2021
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-96928-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rising Canadian and falling Swedish radon gas exposure as a consequence of 20th to 21st century residential build practices

Abstract: Radioactive radon gas inhalation is a major cause of lung cancer worldwide and is a consequence of the built environment. The average radon level of properties built in a given period (their ‘innate radon risk’) varies over time and by region, although the underlying reasons for these differences are unclear. To investigate this, we analyzed long term radon tests and buildings from 25,489 Canadian to 38,596 Swedish residential properties constructed after 1945. While Canadian and Swedish properties built from … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
31
0
4

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
2
31
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…29 However, the global estimation of residential radon by UNSCEAR was still reliable, [13][14][15] although couples of countries reported increasing trend of residential radon concentration, like Canada, Korea, and China. [30][31][32] This may be possibly explained by other reasons. First, as the top risk factor for lung cancer, the smoking rate around the world declined significantly, 33 which may lead to the declined lung cancer mortality due to radon from smoking exposure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…29 However, the global estimation of residential radon by UNSCEAR was still reliable, [13][14][15] although couples of countries reported increasing trend of residential radon concentration, like Canada, Korea, and China. [30][31][32] This may be possibly explained by other reasons. First, as the top risk factor for lung cancer, the smoking rate around the world declined significantly, 33 which may lead to the declined lung cancer mortality due to radon from smoking exposure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach, focusing on the constructive aspects of buildings, was studied by Khan et al, in an attempt to demonstrate the impacts that the changes introduced in residential build practices have on the reduction of indoor radon concentrations [ 37 ]. For this, the authors compared long term radon tests and buildings from 25,489 Canadian and 38,596 Swedish residential properties constructed after 1945, demonstrating that the provisions in the 2010 Canada Build Code have not significantly reduced innate radon risks, highlighting the urgency of novel code interventions to achieve systemic radon reduction and cancer prevention.…”
Section: State-of-the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although radon is emanated by most of the Earth’s subsurface, through most of human history it is reasonable to hypothesize that it diluted naturally in the atmosphere, or was effectively vented from (predominantly non air-tight) buildings to low (< 100 Bq/m 3 ) levels with no evident health impacts 14 . Regrettably, construction practices over the past century have produced urban and rural environments with buildings that capture, contain, and concentrate radon to unnatural and unsafe levels 12 , 13 , 20 , 23 . Residential radon gas levels continue to change over time, often as a function of evolving regional building trends.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Residential radon gas levels continue to change over time, often as a function of evolving regional building trends. For example, new Canadian houses currently show 467% higher radon levels vs modern Swedish equivalents, although radon levels in mid-to-late twentieth century Canadian properties were either equivalent to or less than those in Sweden 23 . This scenario is thought to have arisen not from any identifiable, specific radon-related intervention, but rather as a collateral consequence of ever-changing and often diverging region-specific building practices.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%