2014
DOI: 10.1007/s10346-014-0477-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk analysis for the Ancona landslide—II: estimation of risk to buildings

Abstract: This paper illustrates the quantitative estimation of specific risk (i.e., the product of hazard and vulnerability) for 39 buildings located upon the Ancona landslide based on the characterization of landslide kinematics presented in a companion paper. Hazard is quantified based on intensity, intended as the damaging potential of the kinetic and/or geometric attributes of the landslide, and is expressed in terms of expected exceedance of preset cumulative displacement thresholds for a set of five reference tim… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, the vulnerability of buildings to damage by flood events is linked to the property age, which acts as an indicator of the type of foundation, wall and roof construction (Fedeski and Gwilliam 2007). Models estimating landslide risk also incorporate construction period (Uzielli et al 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, the vulnerability of buildings to damage by flood events is linked to the property age, which acts as an indicator of the type of foundation, wall and roof construction (Fedeski and Gwilliam 2007). Models estimating landslide risk also incorporate construction period (Uzielli et al 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its assessment requires the evaluation of different parameters and factors such as type of element at risk, resistance, and implemented protective measures (i.e., local structural protection) [15]. In physical geography and in engineering geology, most of the studies consider the vulnerability to a hazardous event of a given magnitude as being the degree of loss of elements at risk expressed in a scale ranging from 0 (no loss) to 1 (total loss), e.g., [16][17][18][19][20]. From this definition emerged a wide range of vulnerability assessment models, each study addressing vulnerability in a different way [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This situation is driving geotechnical practice towards a more frequent application of QRA. Examples of QRA applied to landslide management can be found in El-Ramly et al (2003), Kong (2002), Mostyn and Sullivan (2002), Bonnard et al (2004), Lacasse et al (2008); and more recently in Vranken et al (2014), Lu et al (2014) and Uzielli et al (2014). Further application of QRA for landslide management requires addressing its current challenges.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%