1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0039-6060(97)90073-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk analysis of coronary bypass surgery after acute myocardial infarction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
14
0
4

Year Published

1998
1998
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
14
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Acute myocardial infarction has been clearly demonstrated to be a factor predictive of morbidomortality in cardiac surgery (Lee et al 1997). One of the principal limitations in our present study was the low number of patients studied, as were the low numbers of complications.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Acute myocardial infarction has been clearly demonstrated to be a factor predictive of morbidomortality in cardiac surgery (Lee et al 1997). One of the principal limitations in our present study was the low number of patients studied, as were the low numbers of complications.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Patients requiring AVR after previous CABG seem to be particularly at risk, possibly due to older age and the presence of left ventricular hypertrophy [15]. Recent myocardial infarction is acknowledged to be an adverse risk factor for early postoperative death after cardiac surgery, however only in patients with unstable angina undergoing CABG [16,17]. To our knowledge, the presented study is the first to combine these separate risk factors into a simple risk score for patients undergoing AVR.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…In a study of 1,181 patients undergoing CABG, the in-hospital mortality rate increased as the patients' preoperative status worsened, ranging from 1.2% in those with stable angina to 26% in those with cardiogenic shock (265).…”
Section: Class Imentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Those undergoing CABG Յ6 hours after symptom onset had a lower in-hospital and long-term (10 years) mortality rate than those undergoing CABG Ͼ6 hours after symptom onset (237). Other studies have provided conflicting results, because of, at least in part, the lack of clear delineation between STEMI and NSTEMI patients in these large database reports (259,265). In an analysis of 9,476 patients hospitalized with an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) who underwent CABG during the index hospitalization, 1,344 (14%) were STEMI patients with shock or intra-aortic balloon placement preoperatively (264).…”
Section: Class Imentioning
confidence: 99%