Risk and Rehabilitation 2012
DOI: 10.1332/policypress/9781447300205.003.0005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk and rehabilitation: a fusion of concepts?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is not to deny that ‘tik’ is dangerous and damaging, or that it may play a causal role in exacerbating at least some of these problems. This article argues that the stereotypical discourses and constructions used by the media (a) do not serve to represent the far more complex reality of drug use in the country, and (b) frequently encourage moral condemnation, blame and stigma, the result of which limits or prevents effective reduction or rehabilitation efforts (Gough, 2012). As such, while this paper may be critical of the way in which the use and users of ‘tik’ have been articulated and positioned, it is not an attempt to justify or mitigate the harm that the production, distribution, and use of the drug can cause.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is not to deny that ‘tik’ is dangerous and damaging, or that it may play a causal role in exacerbating at least some of these problems. This article argues that the stereotypical discourses and constructions used by the media (a) do not serve to represent the far more complex reality of drug use in the country, and (b) frequently encourage moral condemnation, blame and stigma, the result of which limits or prevents effective reduction or rehabilitation efforts (Gough, 2012). As such, while this paper may be critical of the way in which the use and users of ‘tik’ have been articulated and positioned, it is not an attempt to justify or mitigate the harm that the production, distribution, and use of the drug can cause.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following the disastrous defeat at the battle of Stirling Bridge, and with the king campaigning in Flanders, the earls had broken with custom and contracted with the government to raise troops in return for a lump sum from the exchequer. 17 The letters of protection give just seventy-eight names of the 450 men-at-arms that the earls had contracted to raise, including only nine of the ninety that the earl of Hereford promised. 18 The sources clearly do not offer us an accurate picture of the size of the earls' retinues, so how far they met their obligations is unknown and unknowable.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%