Risk and Resilience to Enhance Sustainability with Application to Urban Water Systems

Abstract

Subject headings: urban water management, risk management, ecosystem resilience, sustainable development, performance characteristics, design criteria, urban planning. Abstract:Many cities in water-stressed environments are seeking sustainable alternatives to traditional solutions such as supply augmentation and water restrictions. One alternative is to upgrade urban water systems in an integrated manner. Design of an Integrated Urban Water System (IUWS) requires understanding the risk of the IUWS failing to deliver sustainable outcomes. We present a rationale for enhancing wellestablished risk assessment and management tools with concepts of ecosystem resilience. While traditional risk assessment focuses on the states of controls that operate on specific system components and the likelihood and consequences of control failure, resilience theory addresses whole-of-system behavior. In identifying critical controls, risk management focuses on the ability to prevent failure and stabilize a certain system state, while resilience focuses on the 'uncontrollable' to identify pathways for managing system adaptation to change. Based on conceptual analysis of two key resilience metaphors, the 'stability landscape' and the 'adaptive cycle', we investigate pathways towards risk-based IUWS design and management that explicitly include system resilience as an over-arching measure of sustainability.Areas for future research include development of methodologies for measuring system adaptive capacity, and identifying and quantifying emerging thresholds.The challenge for the risk assessment community is to reconsider what 'risk' is: in a resilience context, events traditionally seen as risky are not necessarily bad, and may become opportunities. The challenge for the resilience community is to identify thresholds and the system's proximity to them.

Integrated, Decentralized Wastewater Management for Resource Recovery in Rural and Peri-Urban Areas

“…Otterpohl and co-workers estimated that by enacting source control and differential water use, new decentralized technologies could manage wastewater systems with just around 20% of the current water demand [54], which is usually drinking grade. Traditional systems are strongly dependent on electrical energy supplies for pumping, potentially making the system poorly resilient during exceptional events and power failures [55,56]. An underlying assumption of the subsequent discussion is that all wastewater is collected and transported in separate (domestic vs. stormwater) sewer systems.…”

A novel approach for estimating urban water end use characteristics of cities in the developing world

“…This failure of the conventional urban water supply service model has led many authors, such as Porto et al (2007); Bdour et al (2009) ;Blackmore and Plant (2008); Fidar et al (2010); Memon et al (2005); Sharma et al (2010); Zhang et al (2007) to advocate for alternative urban water supply service models to improve sustainability. Such alternative urban water system service models are centred on a fit-for-purpose water distribution principle (Cook et al, 2009;Sharma et al, 2013) that requires the supply of water to be driven by the quality requirements of each specific end-use the water is intended for (Sharma et al, 2010).…”

A Systematic Review of Quantitative Resilience Measures for Water Infrastructure Systems

“…Conventional risk-based strategies have been implemented to guide protection and prevention options that seek to mitigate or avoid the likelihood of expected (targeted) disruptive events and the potential adverse impact from the events [8][9][10][11]. These options can enhance water systems' reliability to some extent and be helpful to prevent undesirable consequences.…”