2013
DOI: 10.1093/rof/rft013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk and Reward Preferences under Time Pressure*

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
17
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
3
17
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Likewise, Young et al (2012) found that under time pressure probability discriminability was reduced and as a result there was more overweighting of small probabilities and more underweighting of large probabilities. A higher degree of time pressure operates in the same direction in the experiment of Nursimulu and Bossaerts (2014). Busemeyer (1985), however, found an opposite effect; there is a greater willingness to take gambles with positive expected value but lower to take gambles with negative expected value when time pressure is imposed.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Likewise, Young et al (2012) found that under time pressure probability discriminability was reduced and as a result there was more overweighting of small probabilities and more underweighting of large probabilities. A higher degree of time pressure operates in the same direction in the experiment of Nursimulu and Bossaerts (2014). Busemeyer (1985), however, found an opposite effect; there is a greater willingness to take gambles with positive expected value but lower to take gambles with negative expected value when time pressure is imposed.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…This time pressure can alter many facets of decision-making, potentially making people more impulsive, defensive, or stressed, and occasionally more risk seeking (Ariely & Zakay, 2001;Dror, Busemeyer, & Basola, 1999;Gladstein & Reilly, 1985;Kelly & Karau, 1999;Nursimulu & Bossaerts, 2014;Zakay & Wooler, 1984). Time pressure may also cause a shift towards more automatic, heuristic-based decisions (Kahneman & Frederick, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although these results suggest that time pressure increases risky choice, the experimental designs of the IGT and BART do not allow us to fully disentangle effects of risk preference and expected value, as the options differ in both risk and outcome value. Other experience-based tasks have also been used to investigate the effects of time pressure on risky choice, but these have also manipulated additional choice variables, such as using asymmetric probabilities or non-binary outcomes for the risky options or different expected values for the safe and risky options (Goldstein & Busemeyer, 1992;Nursimulu & Bossaerts, 2014). Thus, it has not yet been shown if time pressure would increase risk seeking in decisions from experience when other choice variables are held constant.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While this does not prove temporal precedence, it is interesting to note that this profile mirrors variance being a first-order measure of uncertainty while skewness (mathematically) reflects a second-order attribute (the amount of relative gain vs. loss inherent in a gamble). Although recent investigations in trading behavior under time pressure suggest that skew sensitivity emerges rapidly (Nursimulu and Bossaerts, 2013) it is tempting to speculate that this time delay is sufficiently large to potentially affect outcomes in fast-paced markets (where orders can be transacted within 125 ms).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Utility theory proposes risk sensitivity as an implicit by-product of a monotonically decreasing utility function (Pratt, 1964; Müller and Machina, 1987). In this schema, a separate processing pathway for risk is superfluous, as risk-preference is purely a consequence of translating objective quantities into subjective values.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%