2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2020.105099
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk assessment as tool for coastal erosion management

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
65
0
3

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
65
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Another type-1 method is based on the "Coastal-Erosion Risk Index", which is given by the combination of the sub-indexes that describes, respectively, coastal hazard and vulnerability. The hazard subindex is, in turn, composed of variables related to both forcing actions and morphological characteristics, while the vulnerability sub-index deals with socio-economic, ecological and cultural aspects [18,42]. Furthermore, more complex models have been recently developed and account for several separate modules and equations, e.g., the index-based method called CERA2.0, which follows a Source-Pathway-Receptor-Consequence approach and links all components of the system to well identify the risk propagation path [43].…”
Section: Susceptibility/vulnerability Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Another type-1 method is based on the "Coastal-Erosion Risk Index", which is given by the combination of the sub-indexes that describes, respectively, coastal hazard and vulnerability. The hazard subindex is, in turn, composed of variables related to both forcing actions and morphological characteristics, while the vulnerability sub-index deals with socio-economic, ecological and cultural aspects [18,42]. Furthermore, more complex models have been recently developed and account for several separate modules and equations, e.g., the index-based method called CERA2.0, which follows a Source-Pathway-Receptor-Consequence approach and links all components of the system to well identify the risk propagation path [43].…”
Section: Susceptibility/vulnerability Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other words, CVI is the square root of the product among all variables divided by the number of variables themselves. Based on recent applications of the CVI approach all over the world (e.g., Sekovski et al [17] Koroglu et al [36], Díaz-Cuevas et al [38], Rangel-Buitrago et al [42], Narra et al [43], Hoque et al [44], Mohd et al [45]), three different groups are here used to cluster all variables considered in the susceptibility/vulnerability analysis, i.e., forcing-related aspects, coastal characteristics, and socio-economic activities. Such groups and relevant variables are detailed in the following subsections.…”
Section: Susceptibility/vulnerability Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This method determines the changes between different riverbanks by calculating the distance of the riverbanks to the baseline [ 96 ]. The DSAS method uses an arbitrary baseline as a reference to calculate the change in the riverbank [ 97 ]. Therefore, the minimum distance that would ensure the baseline was on the land was determined.…”
Section: Dataset and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are different assumption and tools used by research specialists to assess shoreline erosion, for example, Rangel-Buitrago et al 6 and Stanchev et al 7 Used DSAS 3.2 extension in ArcGIS developed by USGS to identify and analyse the changes in shorelines. An optimal approach is to evaluate the risk of erosion in order to appropriate land use planning.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%