2018
DOI: 10.3390/admsci8040080
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk Assessment in PPP Projects by Applying Different MCDM Methods and Comparative Results Analysis

Abstract: Recently, risk assessment has become one of the most challenging issues in the areas of construction and public-private partnerships (PPPs). To address risk assessment issues, various decision-making techniques have been proposed, each with its own specific disadvantages and advantages. This paper investigates step-wise weight assessment ratio analysis (SWARA), complex proportional assessment (COPRAS), fuzzy analytic network process (FANP), fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP), fuzzy technique for order of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The overall process of estimating risk and making decisions about risk tolerance is called risk assessment. The process of risk assessment acts as a bridge between proper risk assessment and the balanced management of major risks [38]. Risk assessment that has been carried out in this study followed the UK's health and safety executive (UK's HSE) model including four steps:…”
Section: Risk Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The overall process of estimating risk and making decisions about risk tolerance is called risk assessment. The process of risk assessment acts as a bridge between proper risk assessment and the balanced management of major risks [38]. Risk assessment that has been carried out in this study followed the UK's health and safety executive (UK's HSE) model including four steps:…”
Section: Risk Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the differences in interests, corporate culture, and risk perception, the public and private sectors have a different attitude towards risk. On the other hand, it is widely acknowledged that identification is one of the most important stages of risk management, because the identification process is very important for accurate analysis (Valipour et al 2018). Attention to differences in attitudes for risk identification can be helpful in improving risk management in PPP projects.…”
Section: Research Aim and Objectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A consideration of AHP's criticism about most recent developments of the method was provided by Franek and Kresta (2014) and seemed to have settled in favour of the method. Valipour et al (2018) state that in an AHP framework, the decision problem is hierarchically decomposed into a linear top-to-bottom structure, assuming a one-way hierarchy relationship among decision levels. Therefore, as the choice of the office space that is adequate for business process outsourcing (BPO) activities (like the one analysed here) is usually based on a set of independent criteria, AHP is the proper method for the enhancement of such a decision-making task.…”
Section: Analytic Hierarchy Process Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%