2016
DOI: 10.1007/s11069-016-2584-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk assessment of snow disaster for trunk highway transportation in Shaanxi, China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This process enabled the classification of snow disaster risks on arterial highways into five distinct grades. They proposed a distribution pattern for snow disaster risks in Shaanxi Province, with their findings closely aligning with actual circumstances [9]. Xu et al leveraged daily temperature and precipitation data from meteorological stations on the QTP to compile a snow disaster event dataset.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…This process enabled the classification of snow disaster risks on arterial highways into five distinct grades. They proposed a distribution pattern for snow disaster risks in Shaanxi Province, with their findings closely aligning with actual circumstances [9]. Xu et al leveraged daily temperature and precipitation data from meteorological stations on the QTP to compile a snow disaster event dataset.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…The risk of specific geohazards in the corridor should be considered in the decision of highway planning, and it can provide a reference for alternatives selection (Shang et al 2005;Qi et al 2017;Behnia and Blais-Stevens 2018;Zhao et al 2018). The types and distribution of geohazards in the corridor should also be analyzed to evaluate the construction difficulty and the investment scale from a macro perspective.…”
Section: Geohazards Assessment Indicatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the majority of risk assessment methods rely on a qualitative assessment approach, which usually requires experienced experts to judge items, such as the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) method [9] and index weight method [10]. Even some studies that claim to use quantitative risk assessment (QRA) methods [11][12][13] fail to quantify specific economic losses or casualties, particularly for railway engineering with complex facilities and exposure to multi-hazard risks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%