2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.104903
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk aversion and certification: Evidence from the Nepali tea fields

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…solely optimizing on expected income) and high risk aversion (i.e. high preference for avoiding uncertain outcomes) [38,42,43]. Here we show how these two parameters (b i and ∆T ) interact with financial constraints to mediate climate adaptation outcomes.…”
Section: Risk Aversion and Financial Restrictions Mediate Climate Adamentioning
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…solely optimizing on expected income) and high risk aversion (i.e. high preference for avoiding uncertain outcomes) [38,42,43]. Here we show how these two parameters (b i and ∆T ) interact with financial constraints to mediate climate adaptation outcomes.…”
Section: Risk Aversion and Financial Restrictions Mediate Climate Adamentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Average seed and labor costs in Nepal for each type of farming strategy were obtained from Katovich and Sharma [36] and Nepali emigration costs were estimated from Shreshta [37]. Risk aversion of decision-making agents is based on the distribution of Nepali tea farmers' risk aversion as measured by Mohan [38]. The model is initialized using CVFS data on the distribution of households by livelihood strategies in 2007 and run for 44 years to 2050, with two time steps per year in which households can update their strategy decisions (representing major cropping cycles).…”
Section: An Agent-based Model To Simulate Farmer Livelihood Decisionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The upper and lower limits of the CPRA coefficients for each prospect of the experiment are given in Table 1. The intervals were determined by calculating the value of S that would make the individual indifferent between the prospects they chose and the two adjacent prospects (Mohan, 2020). For example, in this study, a choice of Lottery 3 implies a risk coefficient in the interval of (2, 0.85): indifference between Gambles 2 and 3 corresponds to S = 2.0 and indifference between 3 and 4 to S = 0.85.…”
Section: Estimation Of Risk Parametermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Certificação é 'um procedimento pelo qual um ator social independente emite uma garantia por escrito de que um produto, processo ou serviço atende a requisitos específicos' (Auld, Gulbrandsen, & McDermott, 2008, p. 188). Tem sido aplicada para garantir padrões de gestão e de governança nas áreas sociais (Adena et al, 2019;Brown et al, 2017;Gordon et al, 2009;Svítková, 2013;Yörük, 2016) e ambientais (Atasoy, 2020;Cavero-Rubio & Amorós-Martínez, 2020;Mohan, 2020;Wen & Lee, 2020).…”
Section: O Papel Da Certificação Nos Países Europeus Africanos E Nos Estados Unidosunclassified