1998
DOI: 10.1111/1467-9396.00121
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk Aversion, Wealth and International Capital Flows

Abstract: This paper models capital flows in a rich-poor, two-country, two-asset, dual-risk economy with decreasing absolute risk aversion. The first risk is asset-specific. The second is political and dependent; i.e., related to particular asset outcomes. In this framework, the role of wealth in determining asset preferences is demonstrated, and the conditions for diversification are derived. The wealth effect and diversification conditions are applied to explain ongoing two-way capital flows in general as well as the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Turkey: the CG framework La Porta et al (1997, 1998 rede ned the analytical framework for comparative research on corporate governance by introducing an integrated approach to law and nance. La Porta et al's (1998) anti-director rights index aggregates six different shareholder rights and ranges from 0 to 6, where a higher score indicates better protection (proxy voting, cumulative voting, proportional representation of minorities on the board, oppressed minorities mechanisms, below 10 percent shareholding threshold to call for an extraordinary meeting, pre-emptive rights to shareholders which can be waived only by a shareholder's vote and non-existence of any need for shareholders to deposit their shares ahead of shareholders meeting).…”
Section: Corporate Governance: De Nition Issues and Reformmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Turkey: the CG framework La Porta et al (1997, 1998 rede ned the analytical framework for comparative research on corporate governance by introducing an integrated approach to law and nance. La Porta et al's (1998) anti-director rights index aggregates six different shareholder rights and ranges from 0 to 6, where a higher score indicates better protection (proxy voting, cumulative voting, proportional representation of minorities on the board, oppressed minorities mechanisms, below 10 percent shareholding threshold to call for an extraordinary meeting, pre-emptive rights to shareholders which can be waived only by a shareholder's vote and non-existence of any need for shareholders to deposit their shares ahead of shareholders meeting).…”
Section: Corporate Governance: De Nition Issues and Reformmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An extant set of studies documents that risk and uncertainty shocks originating from the political system affect the business cycle (Belo et al ., 2013; Born and Pfeifer, 2014; Kelly et al ., 2016; Mueller et al ., 2017). Risks arising from the political system influence not only profitability but also asset prices (Pástor and Veronesi, 2010; Dimic et al ., 2015; Huang et al ., 2015a; Lehkonen and Heimonen, 2015), international capital flows and investment decisions of firms (Levi, 1977; Clark and Jokung, 1998).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In mean‐variance space a capital flight provoking shift in a country's risk/return profile will also be one dimensional as all investors reduce the proportion of their portfolios held in the country[1]. Clark and Jokung (1998) resolve the apparent paradox of domestic capital flight in the face of simultaneous inflows of foreign direct investment by showing that investment preferences can be reversed at different levels of wealth for utility functions with positive absolute risk aversion and positive absolute prudence. They do not, however, shed any light on the ultimate composition of the portfolio between domestic and foreign assets or on the direction of net capital flows.…”
Section: Review Of the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%