2009
DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01196.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk‐Based Decision Making for Terrorism Applications

Abstract: This article describes the anti-terrorism risk-based decision aid (ARDA), a risk-based decision-making approach for prioritizing anti-terrorism measures. The ARDA model was developed as part of a larger effort to assess investments for protecting U.S. Navy assets at risk and determine whether the most effective anti-terrorism alternatives are being used to reduce the risk to the facilities and war-fighting assets. With ARDA and some support from subject matter experts, we examine thousands of scenarios compose… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
43
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the same way, interesting analyzes may arise when studying the variations of the probability distributions associated to the attacker's successes and failures, when evaluated by the attacker, according to the point of view of the defense. Interesting analyzes of rewards values attributed to terrorist attacks are available in Keeney (2007), Dillon et al (2009), Keeney & Winterfeldt (2011). If the information obtained from defense specialists was more accurate, it would be natural for the analyzes to contemplate a lower level of uncertainty and therefore to be more reliable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the same way, interesting analyzes may arise when studying the variations of the probability distributions associated to the attacker's successes and failures, when evaluated by the attacker, according to the point of view of the defense. Interesting analyzes of rewards values attributed to terrorist attacks are available in Keeney (2007), Dillon et al (2009), Keeney & Winterfeldt (2011). If the information obtained from defense specialists was more accurate, it would be natural for the analyzes to contemplate a lower level of uncertainty and therefore to be more reliable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this, a conceptual framework for risk ( ) R computation is suggested as a function of an existing threat ( ) A , a vulnerability ( ) V presented by a target and a consequence ( ) C for an attack suffered, i.e., ( ) Dillon et al, 2009). Some interesting cases where PRA has been applied are presented by Willis et al (2005), that compare the results obtained when considering the use of the function above with the results derived from the calculation of the risk considering simple indicators (for example, population of a region and the weighted population density of a region).…”
Section: Probabilistic Risk Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Key differences between both risk types are summarized in Table 1. When applying classic risk analysis approaches to adversarial risks, risks may be underestimated in a systematic way [16,17]. The problem is that there are no reliable probabilities available for risks arising from intelligent and rational acting adversaries because they are capable and willing to adapt their attack strategies in response to defensive measures [18].…”
Section: Risk and Classic Risk Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the accident consequences is obtained through calculating the energy generated from different hazardous materials explosions with TNT equivalent model and then the number of casualties is obtained.The expression is as follows [10] :…”
Section: Model Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%