Risk factors and risk factor cascades for communicable disease outbreaks in complex humanitarian emergencies: a qualitative systematic review

Abstract

BackgroundCommunicable diseases are a major concern during complex humanitarian emergencies (CHEs). Descriptions of risk factors for outbreaks are often non-specific and not easily generalisable to similar situations. This review attempts to capture relevant evidence and explore whether it is possible to better generalise the role of risk factors and risk factor cascades these factors may form.MethodsA systematic search of the key databases and websites was conducted. Search terms included terms for CHEs (United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs definition) and terms for communicable diseases. Due to the types of evidence found, a thematic synthesis was conducted.Results26 articles met inclusion criteria. Key risk factors include crowded conditions, forced displacement, poor quality shelter, poor water, sanitation and hygiene, lack of healthcare facilities and lack of adequate surveillance. Most identified risk factors do not relate to specific diseases, or are specific to a group of diseases such as diarrhoeal diseases and not to a particular disease within that group. Risk factors are often listed in general terms but are poorly evidenced, not contextualised and not considered with respect to interaction effects in individual publications. The high level of the inter-relatedness of risk factors became evident, demonstrating risk factor cascades that are triggered by individual risk factors or clusters of risk factors.ConclusionsCHEs pose a significant threat to public health. More rigorous research on the risk of disease outbreaks in CHEs is needed, from a practitioner and from an academic point of view.

Essential healthcare services provided to conflict-affected internallydisplaced populations in low and middle-income countries: A systematicreview

“…Thus, previous reviews have highlighted the importance of research in both areas in humanitarian settings. 30,73,74 The study on IDP perceptions to immunization revealed valuable insights on vaccination, including fear of vaccines being used as a weapon against them. 54 Awareness of such belief can inform appropriate vaccine communication during intervention development.…”

Delivering infectious disease interventions to women and children in conflict settings: a systematic review

“…1 The populations most vulnerable to infectious disease transmission are those who are relegated to live in crowded conditions with inadequate shelter, poor sanitation, insufficient water BMJ Global Health quality and quantity, limited food security and a lack of access to essential healthcare services. 2 These risk factors are major contextual determinants of child malnutrition, outbreaks of communicable diseases and low immunisation coverage in many low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs). 3 Damage to sanitation facilities or a scarcity of clean water means that water-borne and vectorborne diseases are transmitted rapidly.…”

Risk factors for communicable diseases in humanitarian emergencies and disasters: Results from a three-stage expert elicitation

“…The importance and overall risk of communicable diseases and communicable disease outbreaks differs between different disaster types. It is particularly low in geodisasters such as earthquakes or volcanic eruptions (21), higher for flooding (14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20), and much worse again in refugee crises (2, 4-8, 10-12, 22) or complex humanitarian emergencies (1,23).…”

“…Knowing the overall risk profiles can help identify those sites where proactive interventions may reduce the impact of communicable diseases. Key risk factors for communicable diseases identified in the academic literature can be broadly grouped into categories such as Water, Sanitation and Hygiene (WASH), health and public health system, environment, humanitarian response, infrastructure, insecurity, living conditions, nutrition, mass population displacement and economy (23). Within those broader categories, individual risk factors are defined more specifically, although the categories themselves serve as general risk factors as well (1,2,(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32)(33).…”