2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2018.05.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk Factors Associated With Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea in the Week Before the Next Cycle and Impact of Nausea on Quality of Life Outcomes

Abstract: This study identified new factors (e.g., poorer functional status, stress) associated with CIN occurrence. CIN negatively impacted patients' QOL. Pre-emptive and ongoing interventions may alleviate CIN occurrence in high-risk patients.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…MAX2 scores, 36,37 emetogenicity of the chemotherapy regimen, and antiemetic regimens were calculated as previously described. 38 Differences in demographics and clinical and symptom characteristics between patients who did and did not report CFT were evaluated using Independent sample t-tests, Chi-Square analyses, and Mann-Whitney U tests. To evaluate the association between select phenotypic and symptom characteristics and CFT group membership, a backwards, stepwise logistic regression analysis was performed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MAX2 scores, 36,37 emetogenicity of the chemotherapy regimen, and antiemetic regimens were calculated as previously described. 38 Differences in demographics and clinical and symptom characteristics between patients who did and did not report CFT were evaluated using Independent sample t-tests, Chi-Square analyses, and Mann-Whitney U tests. To evaluate the association between select phenotypic and symptom characteristics and CFT group membership, a backwards, stepwise logistic regression analysis was performed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While antiemetic prophylaxis controls vomiting, persistent CIN remains a significant clinical problem (Roila et al, 2016). In our recent study (Singh, Kober, et al, 2018), 48% of the patients reported CIN prior to their second or third cycle of CTX. Findings from 2 studies suggest that CIN could be the sentinel symptom for the occurrence and severity of a wide array of CTX-induced symptoms (Donovan et al, 2016; Papachristou et al, 2019).…”
mentioning
confidence: 83%
“…This study is part of a larger, longitudinal study, of the symptom experience of oncology outpatients receiving CTX whose details are published elsewhere (Miaskowski et al, 2014; Singh, Kober, et al, 2020; Singh, Paul, et al, 2020; Singh, Dhruva, et al, 2020; Singh, Kober, et al, 2018; Wright et al, 2015). Eligible patients were ≥ 18 years of age; had a diagnosis of breast, GI, gynecological (GYN), or lung cancer; had received CTX within the preceding 4 weeks; were scheduled to receive at least two additional cycles of CTX; were able to read, write, and understand English; and gave written informed consent.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Entre os sintomas gastrointestinais, os mais citados neste estudo foram: empachamento (56,0%), xerostomia (54,0%), inapetência (42,0%) e náusea (37,0%). Contudo, outros estudos observaram diferentes sintomas como os mais prevalentes: constipação e diarreia (58,3%) 16 e náusea (47,5%) 21 . Ressalta-se ainda que, além dos efeitos adversos oriundos dos quimioterápicos, quase 35,0% dos participantes deste estudo apresentavam câncer no trato gastrointestinal, fator este que também contribuiu para o surgimento de sintomas relacionados ao sistema digestivo.…”
Section: Métodounclassified