Risk factors for bladder cancer: a case-control study in northeast China

Ye, Yu; Ji, Hu; Wang, Peter; Zou, Yonggang; Yonghong, Qi; Ping, Zhao; Xe, Ramos-Cardona

doi:10.1097/00008469-199708000-00008

Cited by 33 publications

(18 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…We identified 28 studies on the risk of bladder cancer and tea consumption between 1980 and March 2012 [11,12,13,14,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44]. After a closer examination, 10 studies were excluded due to lack of information [35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44].…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

A Meta-Analysis of Tea Consumption and the Risk of Bladder Cancer

et al. 2012

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: Previous studies on the association between tea consumption and bladder cancer risk have only illustrated contradictory results. The role of tea in bladder carcinogenesis still remains conflicting. In order to illustrate the potential relationship between tea consumption and bladder cancer, a meta-analysis of case-control and cohort studies was conducted. Methods: Eligible studies were retrieved via both computerized searches and review of references. Stratified analyses on types of tea, gender, study design, ethnicity and smoking status were performed. Fixed- or random-effect models were used to summarize the estimates of OR with 95% CIs. Results: Seventeen studies were eligible for our analysis. No statistical significance was detected between tea consumption and bladder cancer risk when comparing the highest with the lowest intake of tea (OR = 0.825, 95% CI 0.652–1.043). In the subgroup of green tea, we observed it illustrated a protective effect on bladder cancer (OR = 0.814, 95% CI 0.678–0.976). Conclusion: Our analysis indicated that green tea may have a protective effect on bladder cancer in Asian people. Further studies need to be conducted to better clarify the biological mechanisms.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…After a closer examination, 10 studies were excluded due to lack of information [35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44]. In addition, another study was abandoned for duplicated data [34].…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Meta-Analysis of Tea Consumption and the Risk of Bladder Cancer

et al. 2012

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Upon closer examination, sixteen articles did not provide sufficient information to estimate a summary odds ratio and its 95% confidence intervals [17][18][19][20][21][22], or a summary odds ratio adjusted for at least age, sex and smoking [23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32]. The remaining 19 articles [33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51] were chosen for detailed review.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

A meta-analysis of alcohol intake and risk of bladder cancer

Mao

Lin

Zheng

et al. 2010

Cancer Causes Control

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Ten cohort (Shibata et al, 1992;Michaud et al, 1999Michaud et al, , 2002Zeegers et al, 2001;Holick et al, 2005;Larsson et al, 2008;George et al, 2009;Grant et al, 2012;Ros et al, 2012;Park et al, 2013) and 14 case-control studies (Riboli et al, 1991;Bruemmer et al, 1996;Yu et al, 1997;La Vecchia et al, 1999;Wakai et al, 2000Wakai et al, , 2004Kellen et al, 2006;García-Closas et al, 2007;Sacerdote et al, 2007;Tang et al, 2008;Aune et al, 2009;Lin et al, 2009;Wu et al, 2012;Isa et al, 2013) investigated the association between vegetable intake and bladder cancer risk. The SRR for the highest versus lowest vegetable consumption was 0.84 (95% CI: 0.72-0.96; P = 0.0, I 2 = 76.3%; Fig.…”

Section: Total Vegetable Intake High Versus Low Analysesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Fruit and vegetable consumption and risk of bladder cancer

Liu

Wang

et al. 2015

European Journal of Cancer Prevention

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This meta-analysis was conducted to assess the association between fruit and vegetable intake and bladder cancer risk. Eligible studies published up to August 2014 were retrieved both through a computer search of PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane library and through a manual review of references. The summary relative risks with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the highest versus the lowest intakes of fruits and vegetables were calculated with random-effects models. Heterogeneity and publication bias were also evaluated. Potential sources of heterogeneity were detected with metaregression. Subgroup analyses and sensitivity analyses were also performed. A total of 27 studies (12 cohort and 15 case-control studies) were included in this meta-analysis. The summary relative risks for the highest versus lowest were 0.84 (95% CI: 0.72-0.96) for vegetable intake and 0.81 (95% CI: 0.73-0.89) for fruit intake. The dose-response analysis showed that the risk of bladder cancer decreased by 8% (relative risk=0.92; 95% CI: 0.87-0.97) and 9% (relative risk=0.91; 95% CI: 0.83-0.99) for every 200 g/day increment in vegetable and fruit consumption, respectively. Sensitivity analysis confirmed the stability of the results. Our findings suggest that intake of vegetables and fruits may significantly reduce the risk of bladder cancer. Further well-designed prospective studies are warranted to confirm these findings.

show abstract

Risk factors for bladder cancer: a case-control study in northeast China

Cited by 33 publications

References 0 publications

A Meta-Analysis of Tea Consumption and the Risk of Bladder Cancer

A Meta-Analysis of Tea Consumption and the Risk of Bladder Cancer

A meta-analysis of alcohol intake and risk of bladder cancer

Fruit and vegetable consumption and risk of bladder cancer

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About