2021
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258308
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk factors for increased COVID-19 case-fatality in the United States: A county-level analysis during the first wave

Abstract: The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic is causing significant morbidity and mortality across the US. In this ecological study, we identified county-level variables associated with the COVID-19 case-fatality rate (CFR) using publicly available datasets and a negative binomial generalized linear model. Variables associated with decreased CFR included a greater number of hospitals per 10,000 people, banning religious gatherings, a higher percentage of people living in mobile homes, and a higher percentage of uninsured peo… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

2
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
2
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study showing on a global scale that in countries with more residents attending religious services, there are more coronavirus cases and more deaths caused by coronavirus. These results are in line with the outcomes of studies conducted locally (Millar et al, 2021 ; Vermeer & Kregting, 2020 ) and observations of numerous COVID-19 cases linked to places of worship and religious gatherings (Canete, 2021 ; Tan et al, 2021 ; Yezli & Khan, 2021 ). It needs to be stressed that at the first time point, internal religiosity was unrelated to the severity of the pandemic, which indicates that it is not religious belief per se contributing to the severity, but attendance at religious practices, which typically involves physical proximity to others.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study showing on a global scale that in countries with more residents attending religious services, there are more coronavirus cases and more deaths caused by coronavirus. These results are in line with the outcomes of studies conducted locally (Millar et al, 2021 ; Vermeer & Kregting, 2020 ) and observations of numerous COVID-19 cases linked to places of worship and religious gatherings (Canete, 2021 ; Tan et al, 2021 ; Yezli & Khan, 2021 ). It needs to be stressed that at the first time point, internal religiosity was unrelated to the severity of the pandemic, which indicates that it is not religious belief per se contributing to the severity, but attendance at religious practices, which typically involves physical proximity to others.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Indeed, severe cases are more prone to transmit the COVID-19 infection because of their higher viral load, and they are also more prone to die of the infection (37). The case fatality ratio of COVID-19 in SSA was approximately 3.42%, which is much lower compared than the case fatality ratio reported on other continents (38)(39)(40).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…It was known early on in the pandemic that close-quarters such as cruise ships were epicenters of COVID-19 spread (Sloane 2020). Similarly, increasing the county-wide percentage of people living in group quarters, such as nursing homes and prisons, has also been shown to increase risk (Karmakar, Lantz, and Tipirneni 2021; Millar et al 2021). Our results show that this continued to be important through the pre-Delta time period of the pandemic.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Standardizing the response variables in this method allows for use of standard multiple regression along with elastic net regression, as the case rates approximately follow a normal distribution (Figure A1). Previous analyses by Karmakar, Lantz, and Tipirneni and Millar et al, use similarly scaled COVID-19 cases/deaths (with Karmakar, Lantz, and Tipirneni (2021) using cases per 100,000 and Millar et al (2021) using adjusted case-fatality rate). However, both of these analyses opt for using negative binomial regression via generalized linear models as the response variable is count data at its core.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%