Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
Introduction. The frequency of hip arthroplasty is steadily increasing throughout the world and, although this operation has become routine, the likelihood of postoperative complications reaches 4.3 % [1]. The most dangerous of them are infectious lesions in the area of the endoprosthesis and adjacent tissues. At the same time, in addition to the threat of generalization of the infectious process, there are functional disorders in the joint area and a general deterioration in the quality of life of the patient. Timely diagnosis and treatment of the infectious process and related disorders can minimize the adverse effects of infection.Target. The purpose of this review is to analyze modern methods for diagnosing and treating periprosthetic infection resulting from hip replacement.Materials and methods. The subject literature was searched using the PubMed and Google Sholar databases.Results. The main methods for diagnosing periprosthetic infection include histological and bacteriological examination of the biopsy specimen, determination of sensitivity to antibiotics, blood, and synovial fluid analysis for the content of leukocytes, IL-6, CRP, PCR diagnostics of infectious agents. Treatment consists of re-intervention and/or antibiotic therapy.Conclusion. The most optimal method for diagnosing periprosthetic infection is a bacteriological study of biopsy specimens taken intraoperatively. The preferred method of treatment is determined by the severity of the infection, the degree of involvement of tissues adjacent to the prosthesis, the comorbid background, the nature of the infectious agent, and includes repeated revision surgery.
Introduction. The frequency of hip arthroplasty is steadily increasing throughout the world and, although this operation has become routine, the likelihood of postoperative complications reaches 4.3 % [1]. The most dangerous of them are infectious lesions in the area of the endoprosthesis and adjacent tissues. At the same time, in addition to the threat of generalization of the infectious process, there are functional disorders in the joint area and a general deterioration in the quality of life of the patient. Timely diagnosis and treatment of the infectious process and related disorders can minimize the adverse effects of infection.Target. The purpose of this review is to analyze modern methods for diagnosing and treating periprosthetic infection resulting from hip replacement.Materials and methods. The subject literature was searched using the PubMed and Google Sholar databases.Results. The main methods for diagnosing periprosthetic infection include histological and bacteriological examination of the biopsy specimen, determination of sensitivity to antibiotics, blood, and synovial fluid analysis for the content of leukocytes, IL-6, CRP, PCR diagnostics of infectious agents. Treatment consists of re-intervention and/or antibiotic therapy.Conclusion. The most optimal method for diagnosing periprosthetic infection is a bacteriological study of biopsy specimens taken intraoperatively. The preferred method of treatment is determined by the severity of the infection, the degree of involvement of tissues adjacent to the prosthesis, the comorbid background, the nature of the infectious agent, and includes repeated revision surgery.
Deep periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a severe complication after primary and revision hip joint arthroplasty resulting in multiple interventions on the joint. The present paper describes a rare case of early deep hip PJI of odontogenic etiology. The patient suffered from early PJI after a planned procedure of left hip joint arthroplasty. Antibacterial therapy without surgical debridement was performed in an outpatient unit which resulted in a late, on day 12th after surgery, admittance of the patient to hospital with continued administration of antibiotics. Treatment tactics was selected upon patient’s admission basing on patient complaints, medical history of the disease, clinical signs and findings of roentgenological, laboratory and bacteriological examinations. Two-stage treatment consisting of revision, removal of implant, debridement, biopsy and wound drainage by a swab was performed and followed by empiric antibacterial therapy (for 5 days). Targeted antibacterial therapy was prescribed basing on bacteriological test findings. Together with dentists the authors examined oral cavity of the patient, identified a site of chronic infection and undertook the focused treatment by dental extraction and sanitation of the oral cavity. Postoperative period after the first stage was uncomplicated. Second stage of revision (re-arthroplasty of left hip joint) was performed on week 36 of the surgical time-out with a good clinical outcome: 80 points on Harris hip score in 40 weeks after the second stage. Presented clinical case illustrates the existence of hematogenous mechanism of postoperative microorganism dissemination from the chronic infection nidus with subsequent progression of inflammation at the surgical site, including PJI. In the present case the Actinomyces odontolyticus was isolated from periprosthetic tissues and parodontal recesses which allowed the authors to suggest a highly probable cause for early PJI by Actinomyces odontolyticus translocation into periprosthetic tissues of the hip joint. However, strain sequencing is required for the complete verification. The described case confirms the need for debridement of chronic infection nidus prior to joint arthroplasty aiming at prevention of hematogenous periprosthetic infection.
РезюмеВведение. Эндопротезирование тазобедренного сустава (ТБС) считается наиболее эффективным методом, обе-спечивающим социальную и бытовую реинтеграцию при деструктивно-дистрофических поражениях. Цель ис-следования: улучшить результаты хирургического лечения по технологии артропластики пациентов с деком-пенсированными формами деструктивно-дистрофических поражений ТБС.Материалы и методы. На клинических базах кафедры травматологии и ортопедии Башкирского государственно-го медицинского университета проведено открытое проспективное рандомизированное исследование, вклю-чающее 710 пациентов с декомпенсированными деструктивно-дистрофическими поражениями ТБС. Все паци-енты (n=710, из них 61,97% женщин), в зависимости от диагностических подходов, были разделены на группы: контрольную группу составили (n=406) пациенты с поражением ТБС, которым проводился традиционный комплекс диагностических и лечебных процедур; исследуемая группа (n=304) включала пациентов, которым проводились комплексная диагностика и лечение деструктивно-дистрофических поражений ТБС на основе оценки фазового состояния соединительной ткани.Результаты. Показатели биометрии фаз опоры и ходьбы достоверно улучшились во всех группах через три года после артропластики (р<0,05). Сравнительный анализ результатов артропластики в группах показал эффектив-ность разработанной концепции хирургического лечения при поражениях ТБС на основе системного подхода в виде улучшения показателей компонент локального и системного уровня на 2,38 и 2,3% при остеоартрозе (р<0,05), на 1,61 и 1,84% при асептическом некрозе головки бедра (р>0,05), на 5,62 и 4,37% при посттравматиче-ских поражениях ТБС (р<0,05).Заключение. Анализ ближайших и отдаленных результатов артропластики показал высокую эффективность разработанной концепции хирургического лечения и мониторинга фазового состояния соединительной ткани при деструктивно-дистрофических поражениях ТБС на основе системного подхода в виде уменьшения болево-го синдрома, улучшения функциональных возможностей и качества жизни пациентов. ИДПО, e-mail: rasulr@mail.ru, orcid.org/0000-0001-7650-1926 Минасов Тимур Булатович -д.м.н., профессор кафедры травматологии и ортопе-дии с курсом ИДПО, e-mail: m004@yandex.ru, orcid.org/0000-0003-1916-3830 Валеев Марат Мазгарович -д.м.н., профессор кафедры травматологии и ортопе-дии с курсом ИДПО, e-mail: valeevmm@rambler.ru, orcid.org/0000-0002-6438-8820 Мавлютов Тагир Рыфатович -д.м.н., профессор кафедры травматологии и ортопе-дии с курсом ИДПО, e-mail: radialta@mail.ru, orcid.org/0000-0002-5398-9356 Bulat S. Minasov, Rasul R. Yakupov, Timur B. Minasov, Marat M. Valeev, Tagir R. Mavlyutov, Gennadiy N. Filimonov SummaryIntroduction. Hip arthroplasty is considered to be the most effective method providing social and household reintegration for destructive-dystrophic lesions. Goal of the study is to improve the results of surgical treatment using the technology of arthroplasty in patients with decompensated forms of destructive-dystrophic hip joint lesions.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.