2021
DOI: 10.1080/17453674.2021.1944529
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk factors for prosthetic joint infections following total hip arthroplasty based on 33,337 hips in the Finnish Arthroplasty Register from 2014 to 2018

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The relationship between BMI and risk of infection was not linear; either a high or a low BMI might be associated with increased infection risk 35 . We have noted simultaneous bilateral TJA to be a risk factor for PJI, which was consistent with several large-scale studies 36 , 37 . However, regarding the risk of infection events, the choice between a staged or simultaneous bilateral TJA procedure remains controversial 38 , 39 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The relationship between BMI and risk of infection was not linear; either a high or a low BMI might be associated with increased infection risk 35 . We have noted simultaneous bilateral TJA to be a risk factor for PJI, which was consistent with several large-scale studies 36 , 37 . However, regarding the risk of infection events, the choice between a staged or simultaneous bilateral TJA procedure remains controversial 38 , 39 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“… 11 12 For instance, Blanco et al reported a 15-fold OR (95% CI: 6.54 to 35.80) for PJI in patients with ASA classification≥3 31 and Panula et al presented an HR of 3.2 (95% CI: 2.0 to 5.1) for the same ASA classification. 32 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ASA classification is a crude estimate of a patient’s medical condition and a high score has been associated with the risk of PJI in numerous reports 11 12. For instance, Blanco et al reported a 15-fold OR (95% CI: 6.54 to 35.80) for PJI in patients with ASA classification≥3 31 and Panula et al presented an HR of 3.2 (95% CI: 2.0 to 5.1) for the same ASA classification 32…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The content of the Finnish Arthroplasty Register (FAR) ( 1 ) was revised in 2014 to include new parameters such as BMI, anesthesia mode, use of kinematic alignment, use of an antimicrobial incise drape, and surgical approach. We have previously reported on risk factors for PJI after THA in Finland ( 13 ), but PJI risk factors after primary condylar TKA have not previously been assessed systematically. In 2020 the total number of primary TKAs in Finland was 12,692 and of revision TKAs 1,015 (including repeated surgery), 30% of which were for PJI ( 1 ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%