Risk marker analysis of the cessation and persistence of wife assault.

Aldarondo, Etiony; Sugarman, David

doi:10.1037/0022-006x.64.5.1010

Cited by 121 publications

(107 citation statements)

References 37 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

101

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…[12][13][14] Our study only analyzed a history of violence among the women (not among men, who were not interviewed), but it did find an important correlation between such a history and current violence by the male partner (OR=3.40).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 78%

“…6,10,11,17 However, this finding may be due to people with higher socioeconomic status, whether they are the aggressor or the victim, having more access to privacy. [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18] Nevertheless, in spite of important differences between socioeconomic status groups, it is important to recognize that violence also occurs in groups with higher educational and economic resources. One very general explanation is that in spite of women's impressive but relatively recent access to education and paid employment, enormous gender inequalities persist in relation to many aspects of women's lives, which contributes to the continuing problem of gender violence.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…2,9,10 For example, victimization during childhood on the part of both the victim and the perpetrator of violence increases the probability of being part of violent acts during adulthood. [11][12][13][14] Other studies have demonstrated that alcohol and illegal drug use by the perpetrator are associated with abusive behavior. 15,[16][17][18] Nevertheless, little is known about the determinants of partner violence in Mexico.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Prevalence and determinants of male partner violence against Mexican women: a population-based study

Rivera-Rivera¹,

Lazcano‐Ponce²,

Salmerón³

et al. 2004

Salud pública Méx

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ResumenObjetivo. Determinar la prevalencia y los factores de riesgo en violencia contra mujeres por parte de sus parejas, en una muestra representativa de aquéllas residentes en el área metropolitana de Cuernavaca, Morelos, México. Material y métodos. De junio a septiembre de 1998 se realizó un estudio con base poblacional en 1 535 mujeres, de 15 a 49 años de edad. Para construir la variable dependiente se realizó análisis de componentes principales y, adicionalmente, análisis de regresión logística politómica, de lo cual se obtuvieron estimadores de razón de momios (RM), con intervalos de confianza (IC 95%). Resultados. La prevalencia de violencia leve-moderada fue de 35.8%, y de severa 9.5%. La prevalencia de violación fue de 5.9%. Los principales factores asociados con violencia fueron los siguientes: nivel socioeconómico (RM= 0.57; IC 95%= 0.34-0.95); nivel educativo en ambas mujeres (prueba de tendencia p=0.01) y sus parejas (prueba de tendencia p= 0.002); años de convivir con la pareja (RM= 2.63; IC 95%= 1.55-4.45), uso de alcohol y drogas ilegales (RM= 2.56; IC 95%= 2.02-3.25, RM= 6.17; IC 95%= 2.37-16.03, respectivamente); violencia durante la niñez (RM= 3.40; IC 95%= 2.23-5.18) e historia de violación (RM= 5.89; IC 95%= 2.78-12.5). Conclusiones. Este estudio confirma cómo la violencia en contra de las mujeres es

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 78%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Prevalence and determinants of male partner violence against Mexican women: a population-based study

Rivera-Rivera¹,

Lazcano‐Ponce²,

Salmerón³

et al. 2004

Salud pública Méx

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…There is substantial evidence that high levels of jealousy (Hanson, Cadsky, Harris, & Lalonde, 1997;Holtzworth-Munroe, Stuart, & Hutchinson, 1997) and psychological aggression (Aldarondo & Sugarman, 1996;Feldbau-Kohn, Heyman, & O'Leary, 1998;Sagrestano, Heavey, & Christenson, 1999), and low levels of relationship satisfaction (Holtzworth-Munroe & Stuart, 1994;Sagrestano et al, 1999;Stith, Green, Smith, & Ward, 2007) are risk factors for IPV.…”

Section: Jealousy Psychological Aggression and Relationship Satisfacmentioning

confidence: 99%

Violent Couples Seeking Therapy: Bilateral and Unilateral Violence

et al. 2012

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Little information is available about couples experiencing intimate partner violence (IPV) who voluntarily seek couples therapy. We examined the characteristics of 129 couples who sought therapy for IPV to learn more about this population. A majority of the sample, 74%, experienced bilateral physical violence, 16% experienced unilateral male violence, and 5% experienced unilateral female violence. Conflict theory is used to explain the finding that couples experiencing bilateral violence reported higher levels of physical violence and injury than did those experiencing unilateral violence. Bilaterally violent couples also experienced more jealousy and psychological aggression and less relationship satisfaction than either group of unilaterally violent couples. Implications and suggestions for clinicians are offered, as well as ideas for future research.

show abstract

“…Une typologie des auteurs de violence conjugale, conçue par Holztzworth-Munroe et Stuart (1994), associe la personnalité antisociale à de la violence plus fréquente et sévère. Finalement, Aldarondo et Sugarman (1996) ont réalisé une analyse de variance de plusieurs marqueurs de risques liés à la persistance de la violence conjugale sur une période de trois ans. Les résultats révèlent que les agresseurs persistants étaient plus jeunes, et avaient eu une enfance et une adolescence marquées par la violence familiale.…”

Section: Les Caractéristiques Individuellesunclassified

Prédiction de la revictimisation et de la récidive en violence conjugale

Ouellet

Blondin

Leclerc

et al. 2017

crimino

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

En violence conjugale on ne peut négliger l’impact des circonstances immédiates et les caractéristiques individuelles des protagonistes dans la modulation du cours des évènements. Toutefois, peu d’études ont analysé simultanément les effets des circonstances immédiates, des caractéristiques de la victime et de l’agresseur sur la séquence des violences conjugales. L’objectif de cette étude est de mieux comprendre ce qui prédit la revictimisation ainsi que la récidive. Les résultats se fondent sur 52 149 évènements violents commis entre conjoints actuels ou passés enregistrés par les policiers sur le territoire d’une grande ville du Québec, de 2000 à 2009. Nos résultats montrent l’importance du sens de la violence, des expériences de victimisation et des antécédents criminels dans l’explication de la répétition de la violence, tout en nuançant leur effet en fonction de la récidive ou de la revictimisation. Cette étude peut permettre d’orienter les interventions sur plusieurs plans, en améliorant l’efficacité des mesures préventives et en permettant, par exemple, de déterminer des indicateurs facilement observables sur lesquels on peut baser l’intervention afin de mieux répondre au cours des évènements.Both immediate circumstances and the characteristics of protagonists have an effect on domestic violence. However, few studies have undertaken simultaneous analysis of the effects of immediate circumstances and victim and perpetrator characteristics on the sequence of domestic violence. The objective of this study is to better understand how to predict revictimization and recidivism. Results are based on 52,149 violent incidents involving current or former intimate partners that were recorded by police officers for a large city in the province of Quebec between 2000 and 2009. Our results show the importance of how the violence developed, victimization experiences, and criminal background in explaining recidivism in domestic violence. This study may help guide intervention at several levels and improve the effectiveness of preventive measures by making it possible, for example, to identify easily observable indicators that should lead to intervention in order to make a difference in the course of events.Cuando se trata de violencia conyugal, no puede haber negligencia, ni del impacto de las circunstancias inmediatas, ni de las características individuales de los protagonistas en la modulación del curso de los acontecimientos. Sin embargo, pocos estudios han analizado simultáneamente los efectos de las circunstancias inmediatas, de las características de la víctima y del agresor sobre la secuencia de las agresiones conyugales. El objetivo del presente estudio es de lograr una mejor comprensión de aquéllo que predice la revictimización, así como de la reincidencia. Los resultados se basan sobre 52149 eventos violentos cometidos entre conyugues, actuales o anteriores, registrados por los policías en el territorio de una gran ciudad de la provincia de Quebec, entre 2000 y 2009. Nuestros resultados demuestran la importancia...

show abstract

Risk marker analysis of the cessation and persistence of wife assault.

Cited by 121 publications

References 37 publications

Prevalence and determinants of male partner violence against Mexican women: a population-based study

Prevalence and determinants of male partner violence against Mexican women: a population-based study

Violent Couples Seeking Therapy: Bilateral and Unilateral Violence

Prédiction de la revictimisation et de la récidive en violence conjugale

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About