2018
DOI: 10.1097/aog.0000000000002504
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk of Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes at Advanced Maternal Age

Abstract: Women older than 40 years have a higher risk of chromosomal abnormalities, miscarriage, and birth before 34 weeks of gestation than younger women and should be monitored accordingly. No increased risk was observed for stillbirth and other congenital malformations. Several factors increase the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes, but advanced maternal age drives a high proportion of the total risk score.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

19
126
1
10

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 219 publications
(156 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
19
126
1
10
Order By: Relevance
“…Age is a well-known risk factor for the development of MAOs during pregnancy [ 28 30 ]. Similarly, GDM and gestational hypertension are associated with an increased risk of maternal and neonatal adverse outcomes, especially in case of inadequate glycemic and pressure control [ 30 , 31 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Age is a well-known risk factor for the development of MAOs during pregnancy [ 28 30 ]. Similarly, GDM and gestational hypertension are associated with an increased risk of maternal and neonatal adverse outcomes, especially in case of inadequate glycemic and pressure control [ 30 , 31 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Frederiksen et al ( 11 ) investigated the relationship between advanced maternal age and unfavorable outcomes of pregnancy. Approximately 370,000 single pregnancies were included between 2008 and 2014.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When we assessed risks of induction of labour, operative vaginal delivery and emergency caesarean delivery, we excluded births with an elective caesarean from the denominator as these could not have the outcome of interest. Confounders were chosen a priori based on literature . We adjusted for the mother's country of birth, educational level, smoking status, parity (except in the sensitivity analyses of parity), age, calendar year of birth and BMI.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%