People with colonic inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) have an increased risk of developing colorectal cancer (CRC). Colonoscopic surveillance is advocated in this population, with the aim of preventing death from CRC. This seems intuitive for a high risk group, but there is only limited observational evidence for the efficacy of surveillance [1]. A randomized controlled trial would now be extremely difficult to conduct as one group would be randomized to no colonoscopy surveillance. Furthermore, the absolute risk of CRC is low and it can take years for CRC to develop.A post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer (PCCRC) is one that develops following a colonoscopy that did not detect CRC. The rate of these cancers, as a proportion of the total number of CRCs, detected over a 3-year period has been recommended as a key indicator of the quality of a colonoscopy service [2]. Colonic IBD has been consistently shown to be one of the strongest factors associated with PCCRC, and the 3-year PCCRC rate in those with IBD is between 30 % and 50 % [3,4]. There is debate about whether this metric is appropriate for those undergoing regular surveillance, as frequent colonoscopy tests could make PCCRC inevitable.In the current issue of Endoscopy, Troelsen et al. [5] present Danish population-based data on PCCRC in IBD over a 20-year period to 2015. This large cohort study of nearly 400 000 individuals investigated two outcomes: the cumulative incidence proportion (CIP) of PCCRC within 3 years of a negative colonoscopy, and the 3-year PCCRC rate in IBD patients.