1994
DOI: 10.1007/bf01719362
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk of infections transmitted by arthropods and rodents in forestry workers

Abstract: Abstract. One hundred and fifty-one forestry workers and 151 matched office clerks were compared as to the presence of antibodies against Borrelia burgdorferi, tick-borne encephalitis virus, Puumalavirus and lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus. Their occupational risks of being infected by Borrelia was fourfold and significant, by Puumalavirus and lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus was increased but not significant. No seropositivity has been established against tick-borne encephalitis virus.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus an increased risk of contracting infection with Puumala virus and other hantaviruses seems to be attributed to occupation and not only to living in rural areas. This conclusion is in accordance with data on other zoonoses (19,20). Due to the frequent occurrence of conspicuous renal failure in the acute phase of hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome, a possible relation between passed hantavirus infection and the occurrence of chronic renal disease is of interest.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Thus an increased risk of contracting infection with Puumala virus and other hantaviruses seems to be attributed to occupation and not only to living in rural areas. This conclusion is in accordance with data on other zoonoses (19,20). Due to the frequent occurrence of conspicuous renal failure in the acute phase of hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome, a possible relation between passed hantavirus infection and the occurrence of chronic renal disease is of interest.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Moreover, when estimates for North and Central/South America were calculated individually, no increased risk was eventually identified (RR 0.928, 95 CI 0.389-2.212 for North America; 0.149, 95% CI 0.001-2.371 for South America). Similarly, no significant differences in the prevalence status were identified in studies performed in the decades 2001-2010 (RR 1.295, 95% CI 0.936-1.792) [15,18,42,49], and 2011-2020 (RR 1.163, 95% CI 0.880-1.537) [39][40][41][43][44][45]47,59] when compared to previous reports [21][22][23]30,48,[55][56][57][58]60].…”
Section: Studies On Forestry Workersmentioning
confidence: 50%
“…Estimates on forestry workers were available only from European [15,[21][22][23]30,[40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47]49,55,[57][58][59][60] and American regions [18,48]. Two of the European reports [45,59] seemly reported on the same occupational groups (i.e., forestry workers from Poland), focusing either on PUUV [45] or DOBV [59] but no specific disclosure was provided by study authors.…”
Section: Studies On Forestry Workersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A Dutch study compared the seroprevalence in active forestry workers (high-risk group) and supervisory forestry staff (low-risk group). Supervisory forestry staff had a three times higher risk, while active forestry workers had a five times higher risk for LCMV seropositivity compared to office workers (control group) [ 36 ]. A previously conducted study in Croatia among forestry workers showed that for one working year probability for LCMV seropositivity increased 9% [ 25 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%