2021
DOI: 10.12788/jhm.3655
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk of Intestinal Necrosis With Sodium Polystyrene Sulfonate: A Systematic Review and Meta‐analysis

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Reports of severe gastrointestinal side effects associated with sodium polystyrene sulfonate (SPS), particularly intestinal necrosis, have led some to recommend costlier alternative medications. No prior systematic review has included studies with controls reporting intestinal necrosis rates associated with SPS. METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted using Cochrane Library, Embase, Medline, Google Scholar, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Core Collection from database inception th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, there can be some adverse gastrointestinal symptoms, such as colonic necrosis, constipation, and bowel obstruction. The risk of severe gastrointestinal effects significantly increased with SPS oral administration, but the risk of intestinal necrosis was not increased [ 65 ]. A higher hospitalization rate for serious gastrointestinal adverse events (intestinal ischemia/thrombosis, gastrointestinal ulceration/perforation, or resection/ostomy) was also observed in old-aged patients within 30 days of SPS use (0.2% vs. 0.04%) [ 66 ].…”
Section: Recommendations Of Treatment For Hyperkalemiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there can be some adverse gastrointestinal symptoms, such as colonic necrosis, constipation, and bowel obstruction. The risk of severe gastrointestinal effects significantly increased with SPS oral administration, but the risk of intestinal necrosis was not increased [ 65 ]. A higher hospitalization rate for serious gastrointestinal adverse events (intestinal ischemia/thrombosis, gastrointestinal ulceration/perforation, or resection/ostomy) was also observed in old-aged patients within 30 days of SPS use (0.2% vs. 0.04%) [ 66 ].…”
Section: Recommendations Of Treatment For Hyperkalemiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[42][43][44] Previously sodium polystyrene sulfonate (SPSS) was used to treat hyperkalemia but was not highly effective, it often was given with an osmotic laxative, which had occasional adverse effects on the gut. 45 The newer agents are more effective, better tolerated (even in long-term use) and have been shown to be able to help control serum potassium levels between dialysis therapies. 46,47 For example, Patiromer exchanges Ca ++ for K + , and SZC exchanges mostly H + but also some Na + for K + .…”
Section: Dialysate-regeneration and Oral Sorbents To Leverage "Freedo...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Oral potassium binders have been improved significantly with the market introduction of patiromer and sodium zirconium cyclosilicate (SZC) 42–44 . Previously sodium polystyrene sulfonate (SPSS) was used to treat hyperkalemia but was not highly effective, it often was given with an osmotic laxative, which had occasional adverse effects on the gut 45 . The newer agents are more effective, better tolerated (even in long‐term use) and have been shown to be able to help control serum potassium levels between dialysis therapies 46,47 .…”
Section: Issues With Current Krt Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, SPS has demonstrated adverse serious side effects [ 40 ]. Case reports have reported gastrointestinal injuries such as colitis and necrosis; however, a recent analysis in the literature by Holleck et al [ 40 ] did not find significantly higher rates in intestinal necrosis, although the composite outcome of severe gastrointestinal adverse events was significantly increased. The FDA has provided a warning about the use of sorbitol in concomitance with SPS as it can increase the risk for gastrointestinal necrotic events [ 31 , 32 ].…”
Section: Treatment Of Hyperkalemia: Advances In Therapiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The overall burden of adverse side effects related to the use of new potassium binders seems to not significantly impact on the current administration of SZC and patiromer in patients with HK, and with HF in need for implementation of RAASi therapy in particular, as compared with the old-fashioned administration of SPS. Although the risk of necrosis seem to be not so higher as compared with controls, SPS still continues to show an increased risk for gastrointestinal side effects [ 40 ]. SZC mostly induces oedema as a major side effect, while hypokalemia event rates may vary according to the dosages and the baseline serum K + levels; no significant adverse gastrointestinal events have been identified in the different studies [ 64 ].…”
Section: Current Indication and Future Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%