2004
DOI: 10.3171/jns.2004.101.3.0445
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk of persistent cranial nerve injury after carotid endarterectomy

Abstract: The risk of motor cranial nerve injury persisting beyond hospital discharge after CEA is approximately 4%. The vast majority of neurological deficits resolve over the next few months, however, and permanent deficits are rare. Nevertheless, the risk of cranial nerve injury should be communicated to patients before they undergo surgery.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
81
4
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 133 publications
(95 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
8
81
4
2
Order By: Relevance
“…45,171 Restenosis after CEA has been reported in 5% to 10% of cases when assessed by postoperative ultrasonography but consistently in fewer than 5% of cases when patching was used in recent series. 63,176,[276][277][278][279][280][281] Hemodynamically significant recurrent stenosis rates of 5% to 7% have been reported in multicenter trials. 62,176,276,[282][283][284][285][286][287][288][289][290][291][292][293][294][295][296][297][298][299] Data comparing restenosis after CEA and CAS must be interpreted cautiously because of selection bias and stent-generated artifacts in ultrasound velocity measurements.…”
Section: Durability Of Carotid Revascularizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…45,171 Restenosis after CEA has been reported in 5% to 10% of cases when assessed by postoperative ultrasonography but consistently in fewer than 5% of cases when patching was used in recent series. 63,176,[276][277][278][279][280][281] Hemodynamically significant recurrent stenosis rates of 5% to 7% have been reported in multicenter trials. 62,176,276,[282][283][284][285][286][287][288][289][290][291][292][293][294][295][296][297][298][299] Data comparing restenosis after CEA and CAS must be interpreted cautiously because of selection bias and stent-generated artifacts in ultrasound velocity measurements.…”
Section: Durability Of Carotid Revascularizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are also reports of carotid and vertebral artery dissections leading to hypoglossal nerve injury. [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18] In a large case series of hypoglossal nerve palsies, the site of the lesion could not be localized in 6%. 9 In the radiologic diagnostic work-up, a segmental imaging approach is advised.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…При компрессии тканей развивался парез. Также отмечено, что при превы-шении времени операции свыше 2 ч риски невропатии увеличивались [6].…”
Section: болезни аорты и ее ветвейunclassified