2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02688.x
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk of uterine rupture in Australian women attempting vaginal birth after one prior caesarean section: a retrospective population‐based cohort study

Abstract: Objective Higher risks of uterine rupture have been reported among women attempting vaginal birth after caesarean (VBAC) particularly following induction with prostaglandins, compared with women who do not labour. This study aimed to estimate these risks as well as that associated with oxytocin use.Design Population-based retrospective cohort study involving all women who had their first births by caesarean. In their second birth, risks of uterine rupture among women without labour and women who had labour aug… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

6
60
0
8

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
6
60
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…the risk of rupture with induction of labour was 0.54% for oxytocin alone, 0.68% for prostaglandin alone, 0.63% without either and 0.88% when they were combined. 15 A US study (Ouzouian et al) found no difference in rupture rates between spontaneous and induced labours but found a significantly greater vaginal birth rate following spontaneous labour. 16 Contrary to this, a study by Fitzpatrick et al showed an increased risk with induction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…the risk of rupture with induction of labour was 0.54% for oxytocin alone, 0.68% for prostaglandin alone, 0.63% without either and 0.88% when they were combined. 15 A US study (Ouzouian et al) found no difference in rupture rates between spontaneous and induced labours but found a significantly greater vaginal birth rate following spontaneous labour. 16 Contrary to this, a study by Fitzpatrick et al showed an increased risk with induction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Um estudo de revisão encontrou 4,5% de óbitos associados às roturas 20 . Em um estudo realizado em Israel 8 , obteve-se 45,2% de óbitos e 16,1 em 100.000 nascimentos; em um estudo sueco 9 foi demonstrado 5,1% de óbitos e 4,7 em 100.000 nascimentos.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…O risco de rotura uterina é maior em alguns grupos de gestantes, sendo esses amplamente liderados pelo das mulheres com cicatriz de cesárea prévia 1,2,6,7 . Entre essas últimas, são mais suscetíveis aquelas em trabalho de parto e que apresentam fetos em apresentação anômala, desproporção cefalopélvica, trabalho de parto distócico e as submetidas à indução do trabalho de parto 1,6,[8][9][10][11] . O fato da rotura uterina ocorrer com muito mais frequência em mulheres com cicatriz de cesárea faz dela uma complicação cada vez mais temível.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…This is consistent with other diagnoses such as hypertension and diabetes where broader categories are more reliably reported than specific sub-categories. 9 Although used to report atonic hemorrhage, the specific subcode could also include other causes of PPH including tears and other immediate hemorrhage. 21 Based on these results the authors conclude that ICD codes assigned for atonic hemorrhage are not specific enough to be used to report population rates of atonic PPH.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 However, systematic bias in reporting has rarely been explored. There is some evidence that more severe conditions or those associated with adverse outcomes are more likely to be reported in population data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%