2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2004.02.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk optimization: siting of nuclear power electricity generating units

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Airborne radioactive particles may emit alpha, beta, gamma or neutron radiation, depending on the radioisotope present (Zhang et al, 2014). Margulies (2004) studied the perceived radiological risks in additional nuclear units primarily in the middle Atlantic and northeastern United States of American. Atmospheric diffusion conditions should be considered and compared based on the wind directions and atmospheric characteristics.…”
Section: Environmental Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Airborne radioactive particles may emit alpha, beta, gamma or neutron radiation, depending on the radioisotope present (Zhang et al, 2014). Margulies (2004) studied the perceived radiological risks in additional nuclear units primarily in the middle Atlantic and northeastern United States of American. Atmospheric diffusion conditions should be considered and compared based on the wind directions and atmospheric characteristics.…”
Section: Environmental Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model proposed by Eeckhoudt et al 26 incorporates individual-risk perception into the expected utility to evaluate the external costs that nuclear fuel imposed on the environment and society. Similarly, Margulies 27 proposed a risk-optimization modeling approach to determine the location of nuclear power plants including the induced environmental risks and associated factors. Moreover, Cowing et al 28 considers the shortterm tradeoffs between safety and productivity inherent to the operation of nuclear power facilities.…”
Section: Energy Commodity Producersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Higher energy consumption rates, environmental concerns, unstable pricing of fossil fuels and the tendency of countries to secure energy sources are all reasons for which nuclear energy is considered as a viable option. On the other hand, the increasing quest for safety, power in economic competition, quicker construction periods and enhancement methods for management of nuclear waste are among matters that need more in-depth studies while planning for a nuclear power plant (Margulies 2004). As the construction of a nuclear power plant needs updated science and technology, benefiting from it would mean progress in most sciences and technologies, and would act as a platform for progress in science and technology.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%