2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.05.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk perception as mediator in perceptions of neighbourhood disorder and safety about victimisation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We first examine whether primary and secondary victims of violence are more worried about crime than nonvictims and, if they are, whether seemingly elevated perceptions of risk among victims explain some or all of the statistical effects. Following recent criminological research into the psychology of risk, we define subjective risk as perceptions of the likelihood and controllability of the uncertain and undesirable event, as well as perceptions of the impact of the event if it were to occur (see, inter alia, Acuña-Rivera, Brown, & Uzzell, 2014;Custers & Van den Bulck, 2012;Ireland, 2011;Jackson, 2006Jackson, , 2009Killias, 1990;Killias & Clerici, 2000;Shippee, 2013;Warr, 1987;Warr & Stafford, 1983). Conceiving of personal threat as not just one's subjective probability of a negative uncertain event, but also one's beliefs about its controllability and consequences, we examine whether victims of violence (compared with nonvictims) tend to see violence as more likely, as more consequential for the victim, and as more difficult to control.…”
Section: An Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We first examine whether primary and secondary victims of violence are more worried about crime than nonvictims and, if they are, whether seemingly elevated perceptions of risk among victims explain some or all of the statistical effects. Following recent criminological research into the psychology of risk, we define subjective risk as perceptions of the likelihood and controllability of the uncertain and undesirable event, as well as perceptions of the impact of the event if it were to occur (see, inter alia, Acuña-Rivera, Brown, & Uzzell, 2014;Custers & Van den Bulck, 2012;Ireland, 2011;Jackson, 2006Jackson, , 2009Killias, 1990;Killias & Clerici, 2000;Shippee, 2013;Warr, 1987;Warr & Stafford, 1983). Conceiving of personal threat as not just one's subjective probability of a negative uncertain event, but also one's beliefs about its controllability and consequences, we examine whether victims of violence (compared with nonvictims) tend to see violence as more likely, as more consequential for the victim, and as more difficult to control.…”
Section: An Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At its core, the broken‐windows theory underlines the importance of physical order for the emergence of deviant behavior and the perception of social disorder. For example, Acuña‐Rivera, Brown, and Uzzell () assessed study participants’ risk perception of three locations on the basis of photographs and found that “the more disordered a place is perceived [to be,] the more a person relies on the perception of risk to estimate how safe she or he might be in it (p. 73) and that the absence of physical disorder is a strong predictor of perceived safety (pp. 70–71).…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vulnerability interacts with other factors to determine an individual's perceived safety. For example, new evidence shows perceived vulnerability to be the strongest predictor and mediator of the relationship between perceived disorder in a place and perceived safety (Acuña-Rivera, Brown, & Uzzell, 2014). The authors indicate that the more disordered a place is perceived to be, the more a person relies on the perception of risk to estimate how safe she/he might be.…”
Section: Agementioning
confidence: 99%