2022
DOI: 10.1155/2022/2498306
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk Prediction of Ureaplasma urealyticum Affecting Sperm Quality Based on Mathematical Model and Cross-Sectional Study

Abstract: Objective. To explore the risk of Ureaplasma urealyticum (UU) affecting sperm quality. Methods. Prospective cross-sectional study was conducted. In total, 340 semen samples were collected. According to whether they were infected with UU, the samples were divided into the UU-positive group (observation group) and UU-negative group (control group). The patients with UU-positive were followed up to obtain treatment and collected the semen again after treatment. The semen characteristics and sperm parameters were … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 31 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Co-incubation of U. urealyticum and sperm led to a significant decrease in the number of motile sperm cells and premature sperm death. U. urealyticum lipopolysaccharide is the main cause of sperm apoptosis, and lipopolysaccharide levels in semen affect sperm quality and function ( 31 ). In this study, the normal morphology rate of males infected with U. urealyticum decreased more significantly than that of those infected with other pathogens and the normal volunteers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Co-incubation of U. urealyticum and sperm led to a significant decrease in the number of motile sperm cells and premature sperm death. U. urealyticum lipopolysaccharide is the main cause of sperm apoptosis, and lipopolysaccharide levels in semen affect sperm quality and function ( 31 ). In this study, the normal morphology rate of males infected with U. urealyticum decreased more significantly than that of those infected with other pathogens and the normal volunteers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%