2021
DOI: 10.1002/ehf2.13707
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk stratification in heart failure decompensation in the community: HEFESTOS score

Abstract: Aims Because evidence regarding risk stratification predicting prognosis of patients with heart failure (HF) decompensation attended in primary care is lacking, we developed and externally validated a model to forecast death/hospitalization during the first 30 days after an episode of decompensation. The predictive model is based on variables easily obtained in primary care settings. Methods and results HEFESTOS is a multinational study consisting of a derivation cohort of HF patients recruited in 14 primary h… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 24 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In their study, the RF, XGB, and Support Vector Machine models achieved accuracy levels of 0.64, 0.68, and 0.64, respectively ( 40 ). Verdu-Rotellar et al utilized a multivariable LR model to predict 30-day hospitalization in a sample of 811 participants, achieving AUC-ROC scores of 0.73 and 0.89 in validation and derivation cohorts, respectively ( 41 ). Our RF and XGB models, in particular, appear to show superior discriminatory power when compared to these recently published models.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In their study, the RF, XGB, and Support Vector Machine models achieved accuracy levels of 0.64, 0.68, and 0.64, respectively ( 40 ). Verdu-Rotellar et al utilized a multivariable LR model to predict 30-day hospitalization in a sample of 811 participants, achieving AUC-ROC scores of 0.73 and 0.89 in validation and derivation cohorts, respectively ( 41 ). Our RF and XGB models, in particular, appear to show superior discriminatory power when compared to these recently published models.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%