2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2006.06.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk, trust and knowledge networks in farmers’ learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
70
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
5
70
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…One fisher stated: "Some people I wouldn't tell a thing to because they'd commandeer the place and take it off you." Such norms attached to information sharing are also found among farmers (Sligo and Massey 2007), and support the view that shared information may be important in long-term knowledge development. This is consistent with studies suggesting that individuals use information accumulated over long periods when deciding where and when to fish (Mikkonen et al 2008).…”
Section: Patterns Of Information-sharing Relationshipssupporting
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One fisher stated: "Some people I wouldn't tell a thing to because they'd commandeer the place and take it off you." Such norms attached to information sharing are also found among farmers (Sligo and Massey 2007), and support the view that shared information may be important in long-term knowledge development. This is consistent with studies suggesting that individuals use information accumulated over long periods when deciding where and when to fish (Mikkonen et al 2008).…”
Section: Patterns Of Information-sharing Relationshipssupporting
confidence: 57%
“…These factors may contribute to a long-standing network in which established trust allows greater information sharing and reciprocity. In small groups where trust is engendered by frequency of interaction (Ostrom et al 1999, Dietz et al 2003, the transaction costs of engaging in relationships may be lower, resulting in greater interaction among individuals (Rudd 2000, Grafton 2005, Sligo and Massey 2007. Greater numbers of ties in a network, and higher overall cohesion demonstrated by high density and low centralization, may influence information flow, indicating potential for greater exposure to new information that can contribute to knowledge (Bodin and Crona 2009).…”
Section: Network Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, in Burgess et al's (2000: 126) study on the Pevensey Levels (UK) the authors found that farmers saw themselves as "ingenious, inventive and independent individuals capable of surviving the ups and downs of a boom-and-bust agricultural economy … being able to overcome the adversities of unpredictable nature" and noted that this ability to overcome adversity had become an important part of their local identity. Similarly, Sligo & Massey (2007) observe that the feeling of shared adversity farmers experience in conditions of risk increase both the activity in social networks and levels of social capital generated. Eliminating risk of product failure therefore reduces the potential for ideas and practices becoming culturally embedded in notions of "good farming".…”
Section: Increasing Risk For Suppliersmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…To create a stimulating environment for the adoption of eco-innovations it is absolutely necessary for the whole supply chain to encourage lifelong education and an active information exchange. As agricultural production worldwide continues to increase in complexity, this indicates there may be greater value in establishing networks with peers, local suppliers, and customers as well as other local institutions for gaining awareness of new technologies and practices [30,95,96]. Many eco-innovations are already in a very developed stage of the innovation life cycle, but because of lack of knowledge and communication channels, they are often not well-known.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%