2020
DOI: 10.3389/fspor.2019.00068
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risks of Heat Illness in Athletes With Spinal Cord Injury: Current Evidence and Needs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A total of 40 studies ( Fu et al, 2011 ; Luo et al, 2011 ; Han et al, 2014 ; Li et al, 2015 ; Wang, 2015 ; Zhou et al, 2015 ; Bu, 2016 ; Cao et al, 2016 ; Huang, 2016 ; Li and Chang, 2016 ; Li et al, 2016 ; Zhang, 2016 ; Zhu et al, 2016 ; Gao, 2017 ; Guo, 2017 ; Hu et al, 2017 ; Li, 2017 ; Liu, 2017 ; Wang and Ning, 2018 ; Xue, 2018 ; Zhang, 2018 ; Fan et al, 2019 ; Liu et al, 2019 ; Xiao et al, 2019 ; Zhang, 2019 ; Li and Liu, 2020 ; Wang et al, 2020 ; Wu, 2020 ; Xiao et al, 2020 ; Zhang et al, 2020 ; Wang et al, 2021 ; Xu, 2021 ; Yang, 2021 ; Huang et al, 2022 ; Ouyang and Zhang, 2022 ; Song et al, 2022 ; Wang, 2022 ; Zhang et al, 2022 ; Zhao, 2022 ; Yan et al, 2023 ) comprising 4,473 participants reported the total efficiency rate, and the pooled data showed that XST improved the total efficiency rate (RR = 1.19; 95% CI [1.15 to 1.23]; p < 0.00001) ( Supplementary Figure S9 ). Considering that high heterogeneity (I 2 = 52%, p < 0.0001) could not be changed significantly through the sensitivity analysis ( Supplementary Figure S10 ), we performed subgroup analyses, respectively, by the duration of treatment (7 days, RR = 1.17; 95% CI [1.02 to 1.34]; p = 0.03; 14 days, RR = 1.16; 95% CI [1.12 to 1.21]; p < 0.00001; 28 days, RR = 1.27; 95% CI [1.20 to 1.34]; p < 0.00001) ( Supplementary Figure S11 ), by the dosage form (XST injection, RR = 1.18; 95% CI [1.14 to 1.22]; p < 0.00001; XST oral preparation, RR = 1.55; 95% CI [1.24 to 1.94]; p < 0.00001) ( Supplementary Figure S12 ), by the combination treatment (conventional treatment, RR = 1.18; 95% CI [1.13 to 1.24]; p < 0.00001; neuroprotective agent...…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A total of 40 studies ( Fu et al, 2011 ; Luo et al, 2011 ; Han et al, 2014 ; Li et al, 2015 ; Wang, 2015 ; Zhou et al, 2015 ; Bu, 2016 ; Cao et al, 2016 ; Huang, 2016 ; Li and Chang, 2016 ; Li et al, 2016 ; Zhang, 2016 ; Zhu et al, 2016 ; Gao, 2017 ; Guo, 2017 ; Hu et al, 2017 ; Li, 2017 ; Liu, 2017 ; Wang and Ning, 2018 ; Xue, 2018 ; Zhang, 2018 ; Fan et al, 2019 ; Liu et al, 2019 ; Xiao et al, 2019 ; Zhang, 2019 ; Li and Liu, 2020 ; Wang et al, 2020 ; Wu, 2020 ; Xiao et al, 2020 ; Zhang et al, 2020 ; Wang et al, 2021 ; Xu, 2021 ; Yang, 2021 ; Huang et al, 2022 ; Ouyang and Zhang, 2022 ; Song et al, 2022 ; Wang, 2022 ; Zhang et al, 2022 ; Zhao, 2022 ; Yan et al, 2023 ) comprising 4,473 participants reported the total efficiency rate, and the pooled data showed that XST improved the total efficiency rate (RR = 1.19; 95% CI [1.15 to 1.23]; p < 0.00001) ( Supplementary Figure S9 ). Considering that high heterogeneity (I 2 = 52%, p < 0.0001) could not be changed significantly through the sensitivity analysis ( Supplementary Figure S10 ), we performed subgroup analyses, respectively, by the duration of treatment (7 days, RR = 1.17; 95% CI [1.02 to 1.34]; p = 0.03; 14 days, RR = 1.16; 95% CI [1.12 to 1.21]; p < 0.00001; 28 days, RR = 1.27; 95% CI [1.20 to 1.34]; p < 0.00001) ( Supplementary Figure S11 ), by the dosage form (XST injection, RR = 1.18; 95% CI [1.14 to 1.22]; p < 0.00001; XST oral preparation, RR = 1.55; 95% CI [1.24 to 1.94]; p < 0.00001) ( Supplementary Figure S12 ), by the combination treatment (conventional treatment, RR = 1.18; 95% CI [1.13 to 1.24]; p < 0.00001; neuroprotective agent...…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of all studies, 15 studies ( Luo et al, 2011 ; Zhu et al, 2016 ; Shen and Zhang, 2017 ; Xue, 2018 ; Liu et al, 2019 ; Zhang, 2019 ; Wang et al, 2020 ; Wu, 2020 ; Wang et al, 2021 ; Huang et al, 2022 ; Ping et al, 2022 ; Song et al, 2022 ; Zhao, 2022 ; Wu et al, 2023 ; Yan et al, 2023 ) comprising 4,288 cases reported adverse events. No heterogeneity was found (I 2 = 0%, p = 0.97); thus, a fixed-effects model was adopted.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, assuming a solar load of 350 W/m 2 and an airspeed of 5.5 m/s (20 km/h cycling with no wind), a WBGT of 24 °C could translate to 24.5 °C and 85%, or 35.4 °C and 20%. Heat stress would be decreased in dry-warm conditions, due to the benefits of velocity-based (convective) cooling efficiencies during the handcycle and push segments [29,30]. Unfortunately, while World Triathlon uses a heat policy that relies on WBGT, these data were not reported in program notes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The expert working group recognise that these recommendations may not be suitable for Paralympic athletes where there may be specific physiological considerations and the use of particular moving and handling techniques in the management process. While the reported incidence rate of exertional heat illness is low among Paralympic athletes, 24 their thermoregulatory risk and management of heat strain require special attention. 25 Sporting events with Paralympic athletes should explore classification specific EHS management strategies to safely and effectively cool these athletes.…”
Section: Limitationmentioning
confidence: 99%