2020
DOI: 10.1017/s0022216x20000310
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rival Carceralities: Legitimising Discourses of Prison Regime Formations in Bolivarian Venezuela

Abstract: AbstractVenezuela has two types of prisons: a prison regime ruled by a hierarchical organisation of armed inmates and the securitised ‘New Regime’ system under the control of the Ministry of Penitentiary Services. This article uses a comparative approach to examine how legitimacy is constructed in these competing yet co-existing prison regime formations in Venezuela. Both the Venezuelan state and the prisons under ‘carceral self-rule’ legitimate their respective carceral orders… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Their experiences revealed differences in visiting a state-run prison, where the procedures were more formal and access was far more restricted, compared to those under carceral self-rule. Because of these differences, this article focuses on prisons under carceral selfrule whereas a comparative analysis of the divergent prison regimes in Venezuela is addressed elsewhere in the literature (Fischer-Hoffman, 2020). Additionally, I conducted an hour-long interview with a longtime friend whose son had been in and out of prison in Caracas.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their experiences revealed differences in visiting a state-run prison, where the procedures were more formal and access was far more restricted, compared to those under carceral self-rule. Because of these differences, this article focuses on prisons under carceral selfrule whereas a comparative analysis of the divergent prison regimes in Venezuela is addressed elsewhere in the literature (Fischer-Hoffman, 2020). Additionally, I conducted an hour-long interview with a longtime friend whose son had been in and out of prison in Caracas.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Activists and officials worried that airing internal differences could jeopardize the entire project. This tended to transform debates about the relative success or failure of any program or official position — be it health care (Cooper 2019), oil extraction (Strønen 2017), infrastructure (Kappeler 2017), housing (Martinez et al 2010), higher education (Ivancheva 2017), prison reform (Antillano 2017; Fischer-Hoffman 2020), or participatory democracy (Schiller 2018; Wilde 2017) — into existential debates about the survival of the movement itself. Crime was particularly dangerous because the issue crossed class and party lines.…”
Section: Mobilizing the Will To Securitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this context, the surplus population from the Black and Brown poor urban communities is incarcerated to fill these prisons. Places such as Brazil (Alves, 2018), Mexico (Santos, 2016), Central America (focusing on El Salvador, Guatemala, and Honduras, see Umaña, 2019), Argentina (Loango, 2019; Rodríguez, 2012), Colombia (Moncada, 2010; Moreno & Mornan, 2017), Ecuador (Rahier, 1998) and Venezuela (focusing on prisons, see Fischer‐Hoffman, 2020 and Salas, 2003) share a similar reality.…”
Section: Urban Redevelopment Western Modernity and Blackness In Citiesmentioning
confidence: 99%