2011
DOI: 10.1002/smj.936
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rivalry within strategic groups and consequences for performance: the firm‐size effects

Abstract: SpainOur study examines how, in a given industry, rivalry functions within strategic groups defined according to the size of their member firms and how this rivalry affects performance. We hypothesize that, owing to several forms of group-level effects including market power, efficiency, differentiation, and multimarket contact, strategic groups that comprise smaller firms will exhibit both increased rivalry and decreased performance compared with strategic groups that comprise larger firms. We test our hypoth… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
27
0
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
2
27
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, size permits larger firms to possess more organizational slack (Damanpour, ; Pfeffer and Salancik, ) while concurrently allowing them to better leverage potential scale and scope economies (Ellis et al ., ). This facilitates a strategically more aggressive/competitive conduct (Mas‐Ruiz and Ruiz‐Moreno, ; Smith et al ., ) for larger JV partners (Merchant, ). Implicitly, larger firms have a broader range of competitive strategies available to them, yielding these (larger) firms ‘…better prospects for profitability’ (Wright, : 100).…”
Section: Theory and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, size permits larger firms to possess more organizational slack (Damanpour, ; Pfeffer and Salancik, ) while concurrently allowing them to better leverage potential scale and scope economies (Ellis et al ., ). This facilitates a strategically more aggressive/competitive conduct (Mas‐Ruiz and Ruiz‐Moreno, ; Smith et al ., ) for larger JV partners (Merchant, ). Implicitly, larger firms have a broader range of competitive strategies available to them, yielding these (larger) firms ‘…better prospects for profitability’ (Wright, : 100).…”
Section: Theory and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nitekim daha yakın dönemli araştırmalarında Storey vd. (2008), ÖB ile biçimselleşme derecesi, iş tatmini, işgörenlerin işe yönelik değerlendirmeleri arasındaki ilişkiyi; Mas-Ruiz ve Ruiz-Moreno (2011: 1286, ÖB ile grup davranışı ve buradan hareketle örgütsel performans ve strateji ilişkisini; Grinyer ve Yasai-Ardekani (1981: 471), ÖB'nin ÖY-strateji ilişkisindeki aracı rolünü incelemişlerdir. Farklı örgüt tiplerinde yapılacak araştırmaların da konuya farklı yönlerden derinlik kazandıracağı açıktır.…”
Section: Genel Değerlendi̇rme Ve Geleceğe Dönük öNgörülerunclassified
“…While the competitors' strategy and market position in a strategic group have impacts on a firm's decision-making based on the rivalry theories (Fiegenbaum & Thomas, 1995;Mas-Ruiz & Ruiz-Moreno, 2011;McGee & Thomas, 1986), asymmetric information among competitors also influences the manager's decision making (Brodbeck, Kerschreiter, Mojzisch, & Schulz-Hardt, 2007;Mas-Ruiz, Ruiz-Moreno, & Ladrón de Guevara Martínez, 2014;Özer & Wei, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%