2013
DOI: 10.1080/00343404.2013.827334
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

River of Traffic: The Spatial Fragmentation of US Ports

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is due to the fact, as noted above, that containerized cargo-the objective of most port expansion projects and for which there is the greatest port competition-is "discretionary" and not tied to any particular geographic location. With containers, and the goods within, destined for immediate transport off the terminal directly to railheads or distribution centers, the economic benefits of the port are felt far into the hinterland (Potter, 2015). This historic trend in the port-city relationship can make it more difficult to garner support for expensive publicly funded infrastructure projects if the "local pain" (McCalla, 1999)-which also includes pollution, road construction, and congestion-is not compensated for by local gain.…”
Section: Economic Impact Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is due to the fact, as noted above, that containerized cargo-the objective of most port expansion projects and for which there is the greatest port competition-is "discretionary" and not tied to any particular geographic location. With containers, and the goods within, destined for immediate transport off the terminal directly to railheads or distribution centers, the economic benefits of the port are felt far into the hinterland (Potter, 2015). This historic trend in the port-city relationship can make it more difficult to garner support for expensive publicly funded infrastructure projects if the "local pain" (McCalla, 1999)-which also includes pollution, road construction, and congestion-is not compensated for by local gain.…”
Section: Economic Impact Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, a number of world-leading maritime service clusters have developed in locations such as London, New York, the Netherlands, and Norway, which are "leaders" in the global maritime service network (De Langen, 2002;Doloreux et al, 2016;Jacobs et al, 2011;Pinto et al, 2015). At the regional scale, due to port congestion, land constraints, improved collection and distribution systems, and inland terminal construction, some maritime service activities that were originally concentrated around hub ports have begun to disperse and selectively reconcentrate in the hinterland, especially low value-added activities (Bowen, 2008;Cheung et al, 2003;Fujita & Krugman, 2004;Notteboom & Rodrigue, 2005;Potter, 2015;Theys et al, 2008;Van den Heuvel et al, 2013;Wang & Cheng, 2010). In addition, since the early 1970s, considerable attention has been given to the location of maritime services in cities (Griggs, 1970;Wong, 1982).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%