2000
DOI: 10.1051/aas:2000277
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

${\rm He} (1\,^1{\rm S},\, 2\,^3{\rm S},\, 2\,^1{\rm S},\, 2\,^3{\rm P} \to \, n\, ^{1,3} L)$: Thermally averaged electron collision strengths for $n \leq 5$

Abstract: Abstract. We present thermally averaged collision strengths for electron induced transitions in helium from 1s 2 1 S, 1s2s 1,3 S, 1s2p 3 P to higher lying terms 1snl 1,3 L with n ≤ 5. Results are tabulated as functions of temperature in the range 3.75 ≤ log T ≤ 5.75. Cross sections are calculated using the convergent close-coupling (CCC) method.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
65
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
65
0
Order By: Relevance
“…State-of-theart model atoms for hydrogen (Przybilla & Butler 2004, PB04) and helium (Przybilla 2005, P05) are utilised, which differ from older model atoms mostly by use of improved collision data from ab-initio computations for electron impact excitation processes. For He  these are the data from Bray et al (2000) and Sawey & Berrington (1993), and for H  the data from computations by Butler, as summarised in PB04 -see this work and P05 for further details on the modelling. For comparison, additional calculations are made using the helium model atom of Husfeld et al (1989, HBHD89).…”
Section: Model Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…State-of-theart model atoms for hydrogen (Przybilla & Butler 2004, PB04) and helium (Przybilla 2005, P05) are utilised, which differ from older model atoms mostly by use of improved collision data from ab-initio computations for electron impact excitation processes. For He  these are the data from Bray et al (2000) and Sawey & Berrington (1993), and for H  the data from computations by Butler, as summarised in PB04 -see this work and P05 for further details on the modelling. For comparison, additional calculations are made using the helium model atom of Husfeld et al (1989, HBHD89).…”
Section: Model Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For low-n transitions for which there are ab initio calculations, B99 uses the collision strengths of Sawey & Berrington (1993). We replace these, where available, with the results of the close-coupling calculation by Bray et al (2000), which include continuum states not considered in the R-matrix calculations by Sawey & Berrington.For l-changing collisions, B99 use two different treatments: Seaton (1962, hereafter S62) for low-l transitions and Pengelly & Seaton (1964, hereafter PS64) otherwise. Neither of these treatments allows for angular momentum transfers greater than one unit, and both apply when the projectile velocity is greater than the velocity of the bound electron.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…both much larger than unity as has been observed ( Table 2). According to the model, with e − -collision coefficients from Bray et al (2000), the excitation of the He I 1.0830 µm line is dominated by collisions, so that in this case, the "10830 recombination line" is not really due to He recombination (compare the x He II and x He I regions in the figure). For purely thermal broadening, the line would be marginally optically thick, i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%