2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejcb.2016.06.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

RNA helicase Spn-E is required to maintain Aub and AGO3 protein levels for piRNA silencing in the germline of Drosophila

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, in contrast to previously published observation (12), our results indicate that the ∼76% sequence identity between AT-chX piRNAs and vasa was not sufficient for effective repression of vasa in the testes of D. melanogaster or interspecies hybrids (Supplementary Table S3 and Figure 4C–E). In agreement with this conclusion, the spn-E mutation, which disrupts piRNA biogenesis in the germline (52), did not influence vasa transcription or translation of vasa as would be expected if the AT-chX piRNAs mediated vasa repression. In contrast, strong repression was associated with generation of secondary piRNAs when the level of sequence identity between the target and piRNA is at least 90% as in the case of Su(Ste) piRNAs targeting Stellate (Supplementary Table S5) and in the case of AT-chX piRNAs targeting vasa of D. mauritiana across the melanogaster–mauritiana species barrier (Figure 5 and Supplementary Table S7).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…However, in contrast to previously published observation (12), our results indicate that the ∼76% sequence identity between AT-chX piRNAs and vasa was not sufficient for effective repression of vasa in the testes of D. melanogaster or interspecies hybrids (Supplementary Table S3 and Figure 4C–E). In agreement with this conclusion, the spn-E mutation, which disrupts piRNA biogenesis in the germline (52), did not influence vasa transcription or translation of vasa as would be expected if the AT-chX piRNAs mediated vasa repression. In contrast, strong repression was associated with generation of secondary piRNAs when the level of sequence identity between the target and piRNA is at least 90% as in the case of Su(Ste) piRNAs targeting Stellate (Supplementary Table S5) and in the case of AT-chX piRNAs targeting vasa of D. mauritiana across the melanogaster–mauritiana species barrier (Figure 5 and Supplementary Table S7).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Nuage structures are close to the cytoplasmic face of nuclear pores and are sites where the ping-pong cycle occurs and TE silencing takes place. These reports indicated that SpnE was not required for nuage assembly and that SpnE was required for maintenance of Aub and Ago3 protein levels, but not for transcription of these genes [ 35 , 52 ]. In D. melanogaster mutant for SpnE WNV replication increased compared to control flies which suggested an antiviral activity of SpnE in this model via a RNAi-dependent mechanism; however, this was not directly shown [ 36 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interface between nuage and the nucleus has been shown to be critical for piRNA biogenesis and transposon target recognition and repression. Although nuage has been characterized as a static and longterm platform for piRNA biogenesis, individual nuage components, such as Aub and Ago3, are dynamically shuttled in and out of nuage [1,6,[19][20][21]. Unlike Aub and Ago3, Piwi shows predominantly nuclear localization [22] and has not been well-characterized within the context of nuage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%