2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ab.2016.08.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

RNASwift: A rapid, versatile RNA extraction method free from phenol and chloroform

Abstract: RNASwift is an inexpensive, versatile method for the rapid extraction of RNA. Existing RNA extraction methods typically use hazardous chemicals including phenol, chloroform and formamide which are often difficult to completely remove from the extracted RNA. RNASwift uses sodium chloride and sodium dodecyl sulphate to lyse the cells and isolate the RNA from the abundant cellular components in conjunction with solid phase extraction or isopropanol precipitation to rapidly purify the RNA. Moreover, the purified R… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
58
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
58
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This method termed (RNAsnap™) generated similar quality and yield compared to the commercial guanidium isothiocyanate −phenol/chloroform based methods. In addition phenol/chloroform free methods have also been developed for the efficient extraction of RNA [27] . Therefore, optimising efficient extraction of high quality RNA whilst simultaneously minimising RNA degradation and rapidly assessing RNA quality is important.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method termed (RNAsnap™) generated similar quality and yield compared to the commercial guanidium isothiocyanate −phenol/chloroform based methods. In addition phenol/chloroform free methods have also been developed for the efficient extraction of RNA [27] . Therefore, optimising efficient extraction of high quality RNA whilst simultaneously minimising RNA degradation and rapidly assessing RNA quality is important.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…22 RNA purification was performed using the RNASwift method as previously described. 23 Full details are provided in ESI. † RNA quantification was performed using a Nanodrop 2000 UV visible spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific) using an extinction coefficient of 0.021 (μg mL −1 ) −1 cm −1 which corresponds to 1 A 260 = 46.52 µg ml −1 .…”
Section: Expression and Purification Of Dsrna In Vivo Using E Coli Hmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following E. coli growth, dsRNA was extracted using conditions to ensure all ssRNA is degraded, prior to purification of the dsRNA using solid phase extraction (SPE). 23 For in vitro transcription of dsRNA the corresponding ssRNAs were in vitro transcribed prior to purification using SPE and formation of dsRNA by incubating equal concentrations of the ssRNA. The analyses of dsRNA using native agarose gel electrophoresis following extraction and purification of dsRNA molecules generated in vivo and in vitro are shown in Fig.…”
Section: Analysis Of Long Dsrna Produced In Vitro and In Vivo Revealsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cells (1×10 5 ) were trypsinized and mixed with 0.5 ml TRIzol (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) for lysis. Total RNA was then extracted using the phenol chloroform method ( 28 ). The purity of RNA was determined by A260/A280 using ultraviolet spectrophotometry (Nanodrop ND2000, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%