IEEE INFOCOM 2020 - IEEE Conference on Computer Communications Workshops (INFOCOM WKSHPS) 2020
DOI: 10.1109/infocomwkshps50562.2020.9162976
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

RNBG: A Ranking Nodes Based IP Geolocation Method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The measurement data are analyzed and processed to establish the mapping relationship with the geographic location to achieve IP geolocation. According to the differences in research methods that are divided into two categories: (1) There are the rule-based IP geolocation algorithms such as SLG [20], Corr-SLG [10], RNBG [9], and Geo-PoP [21]; network characteristics combined with the analysis of the real geographic location are used to discover the corresponding rules. The core rule of SLG is to filter the landmarks with the smallest relative delay to the target IP, based on the assumption that the relative delay size is proportional to the distance.…”
Section: Ip Geolocation Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The measurement data are analyzed and processed to establish the mapping relationship with the geographic location to achieve IP geolocation. According to the differences in research methods that are divided into two categories: (1) There are the rule-based IP geolocation algorithms such as SLG [20], Corr-SLG [10], RNBG [9], and Geo-PoP [21]; network characteristics combined with the analysis of the real geographic location are used to discover the corresponding rules. The core rule of SLG is to filter the landmarks with the smallest relative delay to the target IP, based on the assumption that the relative delay size is proportional to the distance.…”
Section: Ip Geolocation Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with IPv4, IPv6 has changed differently in terms of address pools, access methods, protocols, traffic characteristics, and AS-domain-level paths [7]. In a study related to the traditional IPv4 geolocation algorithm, IPv6-CBG [8] shows that the geolocation error of IPv6 networks is about 30% higher than that of IPv4 in the same experimental region due to the high latency in IPv6 networks; the RNBG [9] algorithm relies on the delay distribution rules in IPv4 and the difference in the delay distribution caused by the topological changes in IPv6. The Corr-SLG [10] algorithm enhances the SLG algorithm in weakly connected networks by evaluating the positive and negative correlations of hosts' relative delay distances, but it cannot improve the localization accuracy for weakly connected hosts and degraded localization performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rapid proliferation of the Internet and the ubiquitous adoption of mobile applications have precipitated an unprecedented demand for the precise geolocation of IP addresses [1,2]. In the recent past, a multitude of IP geolocation methodologies have been proposed, finding wide-ranging applications across diverse sectors such as online services, targeted advertising, social sharing, network performance enhancement, and bolstering network security [3][4][5]. The most commonly employed technique for IP geolocation hinges on database queries, which involves soliciting an IP geolocation database to extract the geolocation specifics of IP addresses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous works like [4] point out that the geographical locations of users or content providers are important information for detecting unauthenticated or malicious devices. IP geolocation can find the geographical location of Internet hosts as well as smart devices based on its IP address [5]. Besides authentication, IP geolocation also helps in identifying the geographical location of cyberattacks or online frauds for law enforcement organizations and government agencies [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…City-level IP geolocation has developed into a relatively mature stage. e main methods include GeoPing [7], CBG [8], TBG [9], Octant [10], Structon [11], GeoGet [12], Chen-Geo [13], PLAG [14], Yuan-Geo [15], and RNBG [5]. is paper mainly discusses street-level IP geolocation methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%