2013
DOI: 10.7243/2050-2273-2-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

RND-4 efflux transporter gene deletion in Burkholderia cenocepacia J2315: a proteomic analysis

Abstract: Background: The Burkholderia cenocepacia J2315 is Gram-negative bacterium that is a pathogen for cystic fibrosis (CF) patients. It displays a high-level of resistance to most antimicrobial drugs. In Gram-negative bacteria, the ResistanceNodulation-Cell Division (RND) transporter family has a poorly understood role in multidrug resistance. In a previous publication we analysed the RND-4 and RND-9 transporters by microarray analysis. The obtained results suggested that only RND-4 contributes to the antibiotic re… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A proteomic analysis of the effects of RND-4 gene deletion revealed about 70 differentially expressed proteins, most of which were associated with cellular functions other than drug resistance. This suggests that RND-4 plays a more general role in B. cenocepacia ’s biology ( Gamberi et al, 2013 ). Aside from the key role that efflux, especially RND-mediated efflux, plays in adaptation to antibiotic exposure ( Bazzini et al, 2011b ; Sass et al, 2011 ; Tseng et al, 2014 ), survival of Burkholderia species in various niche environments and accompanying conditions, e.g., the cystic fibrosis airways ( Mira et al, 2011 ), marine habitats ( Maravic et al, 2012 ), oxygen levels ( Hemsley et al, 2014 ), exposure to noxious chemicals ( Rushton et al, 2013 ), and other ecological niches ( Liu et al, 2015 ), involves to various degrees changes in efflux pump expression.…”
Section: Burkholderia Cenocepaciamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A proteomic analysis of the effects of RND-4 gene deletion revealed about 70 differentially expressed proteins, most of which were associated with cellular functions other than drug resistance. This suggests that RND-4 plays a more general role in B. cenocepacia ’s biology ( Gamberi et al, 2013 ). Aside from the key role that efflux, especially RND-mediated efflux, plays in adaptation to antibiotic exposure ( Bazzini et al, 2011b ; Sass et al, 2011 ; Tseng et al, 2014 ), survival of Burkholderia species in various niche environments and accompanying conditions, e.g., the cystic fibrosis airways ( Mira et al, 2011 ), marine habitats ( Maravic et al, 2012 ), oxygen levels ( Hemsley et al, 2014 ), exposure to noxious chemicals ( Rushton et al, 2013 ), and other ecological niches ( Liu et al, 2015 ), involves to various degrees changes in efflux pump expression.…”
Section: Burkholderia Cenocepaciamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The search for RND 2 and RND 4 operons in 797 Burkholderia genomes revealed that the RND 4 operon is highly conserved, being present in almost all the genomes examined. The high conservation of RND 4 is consistent with the critical role of this operon in multiple antibiotic resistance, virulence, and other cellular processes [ 23 – 26 , 28 ]. Further, a gene encoding a TetR family transcriptional regulator located upstream of RND 4 is highly conserved, suggesting that regulatory elements controlling the RND 4 operon expression are also common to all Burkholderia species.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…This pump is also associated with the modulation of some virulence factors (motility, biofilm formation, chemotaxis and quorum sensing ) [ 24 ]. A proteomic analysis comparing the parental strain and the deletion mutant suggests a more general role for RND 4 in the physiology of B. cenocepacia cells [ 28 ]. Conversely, the Burkholderia RND 2 protein is not expressed during growth on LB medium, and its role in antibiotic resistance can only be revealed when overexpressed in E. coli [ 29 ] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…IEF was performed on IPG strips (BioRad) having pH 3–10 nonlinear and 18 cm length by using an Ettan IPGphor™ system with Ettan IPGphor Manifold™ (GE Healthcare). Briefly, IPG strips were rehydrated overnight with 350 μL of rehydration solution (8 M urea, 2% w/v CHAPS, 0.5% w/v DTE) supplemented with 0.5% v/v carrier ampholyte (Biorad) and a trace of bromophenol blue by using IPGbox . Then the strips were transferred to Ettan IPGphor Manifold, covered with inert oil.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A total of 600 μg of protein sample was loaded into the sample cups placed near the anode. The strips were focused at 16°C according to the following electrical conditions: 200 V for 1 h, 300 V for 1 h, from 300 to 3500 V in 30 min, 3500 V for 4 h, 5000 for 2 h, from 5000 to 8000 V in 30 min, and 8000 V until a total of 90 000 V/h was reached, with a limiting current of 50 μA/strip . After IEF, the equilibration steps were performed in 6 M urea, 2% w/v SDS, 2% w/v DTE, 30% v/v glycerol, and 0.05 M Tris‐HCL pH 6.8 for 10 min, then in the same buffer containing 2.5% w/v iodoacetamide (IA) in place of DTE, for other 10 min .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%