2014 IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium 2014
DOI: 10.1109/igarss.2014.6947035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Road extraction from high resolution remote sensing image using multiresolution in case of major disaster

Abstract: Road extraction is a topical research because of complexity due to his large topological variability. Increasing the spatial resolution generates noise which makes extraction difficult, especially in case of major disaster in an urban context. This problem increases false alarm rates and generally affects the performance of road extraction algorithm. Our aim is to improve the quality of roads extraction after adaptation of the Lowe's SIFT descriptors (scale-invariant feature transform) jointly with spectral an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
15
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
15
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In terms of correctness, our proposed algorithm achieves better results and does not produce false alarms, in contrast to Coulibaly et al's method [48], which generates several false alarms, especially for study area 2. In terms of redundancy, both algorithms obtain very good results for all three study areas.…”
Section: Comparisons With Existing Methodscontrasting
confidence: 48%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In terms of correctness, our proposed algorithm achieves better results and does not produce false alarms, in contrast to Coulibaly et al's method [48], which generates several false alarms, especially for study area 2. In terms of redundancy, both algorithms obtain very good results for all three study areas.…”
Section: Comparisons With Existing Methodscontrasting
confidence: 48%
“…In terms of redundancy, both algorithms obtain very good results for all three study areas. As with completeness, the proposed algorithm outperforms Coulibaly et al's [48] method for study area 1 and study area 3.…”
Section: Comparisons With Existing Methodsmentioning
confidence: 38%
See 3 more Smart Citations